A systematic identification of resistance determinants to antisense antibiotics suggests adaptation strategies dependent on the delivery peptide

Adam J Mulkern,Thu-Hien Vu,Linda Popella,Tobias Kerrinnes,Svetlana Đurica-Mitić,Lars Barquist,Jörg Vogel,Marco Galardini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.29.620885
2024-10-29
Abstract:The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among human pathogenic microbes is a serious threat to global health, calling for the development of novel treatment strategies. Antibiotics based on programmable antisense oligomers (asobiotics) offer an attractive solution to the "arms-race", as their specificity can be quickly updated and tailored to target resistant bacteria. In order to understand the genetic architecture of resistance to asobiotics, we employed laboratory evolution assays to identify mutations that decrease susceptibility to antisense peptide nucleic acid (PNA) against four major gram-negative pathogens: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We observed that the reduction in susceptibility upon asobiotics treatment was dependent on the specific cell penetrating peptide (CPP) being conjugated to the PNAs, suggesting that reduced uptake is a common adaptation strategy only against the (KFF)3-K CPP. We in fact observed that sbmA was frequently mutated in all tested species when treated with (KFF)3-K conjugated PNAs. We further identified mutations related to translation, peptide transport and cell envelope, which provide new hypotheses on cellular response to CPP-PNAs conjugates. Furthermore, for (RXR)4XB-acpP we observed a modest increase in resistance only when mutations in the PNA binding site were induced, which could easily be bypassed by changing the PNA sequence. These findings indicate that the specific identity of the CPP used plays a key role in determining its robustness against the evolution of resistance, and that laboratory evolution can illuminate the remaining gaps in our knowledge on the mechanisms of action of asobiotics.
Microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to systematically identify the determinants of resistance to antisense antibiotics (asobiotics) and explore the impact of different cell-penetrating peptides (CPP) on these resistance mechanisms. Specifically, the researchers conducted laboratory evolution experiments to observe the adaptation strategies of four major Gram-negative pathogens (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella typhimurium, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) under different CPP-PNA combinations. ### Main Issues 1. **Genetic Basis of Resistance Mechanisms**: The researchers aim to identify the gene mutations that lead to resistance through laboratory evolution experiments, particularly whether these mutations are associated with specific CPPs. 2. **Impact of CPP Selection on Resistance**: The researchers seek to understand how the selection of different CPPs affects the development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics. 3. **Universality and Specificity of Resistance Mechanisms**: The researchers aim to explore the universality and specificity of these resistance mechanisms across different pathogens to provide guidance for the development of new antibacterial strategies. ### Research Methods - **Laboratory Evolution Experiments**: Inducing bacterial resistance by gradually increasing the concentration of antibiotics ("drug selection ramp"). - **Whole-Genome Sequencing**: Performing whole-genome sequencing on ancestral and adapted strains to identify gene mutations that lead to resistance. - **Phenotypic Analysis**: Assessing the resistance levels of different strains under various CPP-PNA combinations through minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measurements. ### Main Findings 1. **High Frequency of sbmA Gene Mutations**: Among all tested species, the strains treated with (KFF)3K-PNA showed the highest frequency of sbmA gene mutations, indicating that this gene plays a key role in the development of resistance. 2. **Impact of CPP Selection on Resistance**: Strains treated with (KFF)3K-PNA exhibited higher resistance levels, while those treated with (D-KFF)3K-PNA and (RXR)4XB-PNA showed lower resistance levels. 3. **Mutations in Other Related Genes**: In addition to the sbmA gene, mutations were also found in genes related to translation, peptide transport, and cell envelope, providing new hypotheses to explain the cellular response mechanisms to CPP-PNA complexes. ### Conclusion This study systematically reveals the different impacts of various CPP-PNA combinations on the development of bacterial resistance, particularly the critical role of the sbmA gene in resistance development. These findings contribute to the understanding of resistance mechanisms and provide important references for the development of more resistant programmable sequence-based antibacterial drugs.