Extending sampling approaches for great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) eDNA monitoring

Lynsey R Harper,Kirsten J Harper,Suzie Platts,Rebecca Irwin,Michael Bennett,Ben Jones,Oliver Taylor,Laura Plant,Danielle Eccleshall,Andrew Briscoe,Luke Gorman,Kat Stanhope,Bastian Egeter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.21.619420
2024-10-21
Abstract:Environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring has been used for great crested newt (Triturus cristatus, GCN) survey in the UK since the publication of a Defra-funded trial in 2014. Surveys can only be performed during a 76-day survey window (15 April - 30 June), and only if approved methods for collection of 6 x 15 mL subsamples for ethanol precipitation are used. However, filtration may be a more effective and sustainable method of eDNA capture than ethanol precipitation, and detection may be possible outside of the current survey window. We investigated whether the GCN eDNA survey season could be extended and filtration could be used for GCN eDNA capture by reviewing the available evidence and conducting a field study from April to October 2022. Paired water samples for ethanol precipitation and filtration were collected from ponds once a month, resulting in 124 ethanol precipitation kits and 124 filtration kits from 25 ponds. All samples were analysed with the approved quantitative PCR assay for GCN. Our results indicate that GCN can be reliably detected using both eDNA capture methods from April to August, with detection rates decreasing in September and October. GCN eDNA detection was comparable or higher with filtration than ethanol precipitation, thus filtration could be a reliable and more sustainable means for assessing GCN presence. Inclusion of filtration as an accepted eDNA capture method for GCN eDNA surveys would allow more water to be processed for robust and reliable estimates of GCN presence. Extending the GCN eDNA survey season to August would allow more waterbodies to be surveyed and identification of sites that provide important habitat for GCN outside of the breeding season. This would also remove logistical challenges and costs associated with completing GCN surveys and laboratory analysis within 10 weeks, improving performance of surveyors and laboratories as well as quality of results. Furthermore, GCN eDNA surveys could be carried out alongside monitoring for other species, which would enable infrastructure projects to develop more effective mitigation measures as well as reduce time required from surveyors and survey costs.
Ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?