Predictive accuracy of diagnostic tests for excessive bleeding in cardiac surgery: the COPTIC-C study

Weiqi Liao,Robert Grant,Florence Y Lai,Hardeep Aujla,Marcin J Wozniak,Hasmukh R Patel,Laura Green,Andrew Mumford,Gavin J Murphy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.17.24315651
2024-10-17
Abstract:Abstract Purpose We tested the hypothesis that addition of biomarkers of multimorbidity and biological ageing would improve the predictive accuracy of point-of-care viscoelastometry or laboratory tests of coagulation for clinically important bleeding following cardiac surgery. Methods The analyses included 2437 participants in the Coagulation and Platelet laboratory Testing in Cardiac surgery (COPTIC study) with complete clinical, TEG5000 Thromboelastography, ROTEM, Multiplate aggregometry, full blood count, laboratory reference tests of coagulopathy, and biomarkers of biological ageing and multimorbidity. Models with different biomarkers to predict the composite primary outcome, Clinically Important Bleeding, was developed using logistic regression and internally validated using 10-fold cross-validation. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the models were assessed comprehensively. Results For the primary outcome, the AUROC for the best predictive model using TEG/ROTEM with other biomarkers was 0.694 (0.612-0.775). The best predictive model included laboratory reference tests of coagulation, full blood count results, and biomarkers of multimorbidity and ageing, AUROC=0.701 (0.620-0.781), although clinical utility was not superior to using laboratory reference tests alone. Discrimination was higher for components of the primary outcome; large volume (>=4 units) red cell transfusion 0.754 (0.602-0.903), and large volume procoagulant transfusion 0.723 (0.590-0.857), but not for excess loss in drains/re-sternotomy 0.701 (0.613-0.788). Calibration was generally good among the models. Conclusion Diagnostic tests for bleeding following cardiac surgery demonstrate moderate discrimination, although this was influenced by the definition of bleeding. Small improvements in discrimination with inclusion of additional disease biomarkers, with similar calibration and clinical utility.
Cardiovascular Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?