Intensity of care and the health status of caregivers to elderly rural South Africans

Sostina Spiwe Matina,Lenore Manderson,F. Xavier Gomez Olive,Lisa Berkman,Guy Harling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.16.24315588

2024-10-17

Abstract:Objectives: Informal caregivers play an indispensable role in and are often the sole source of care for older adults in low and middle-income settings worldwide. Intensive informal care predicts mortality and morbidity among caregivers in higher-income settings. However, there is limited evidence from poorer settings, including Africa countries, where caregiving is shared widely, including across generations. We therefore investigated caregivers health status in rural South Africa. Methods: We conducted quantitative interviews with all household members and all non-household caregivers aged 12 and above (n=1012) of 106 older adults in rural Mpumalanga, South Africa. We used multivariable regression with care-recipient random intercepts to assess the relationships between four caregiving characteristics and both self-reported chronic conditions and self-reported health status, considering how caregiver age moderated each association. Results: Over half of all caregivers reported at least one chronic health condition, despite half being aged under 40. Caregivers self-reporting the worst health status provided high hours of care. However, caregivers health status was not significantly associated with weekly care quantity or history of caring. Those aged 40 and below who reported being a main caregiver had 52% increased odds of reporting poorer health compared to other same-aged carers (95% confidence interval: 0.99, 2.35), while having more chronic conditions was associated with being expected to act as a sole caregiver more often among caregivers under 39. Discussion: Greater caring responsibilities for older adults were not consistently associated with caregivers health in a setting where poor health is common, and caregiving is spread widely. Longitudinal data is necessary to unpack possible explanations of these findings, and to determine whether intensive caregiving speeds downward health trajectories for carers.

Public and Global Health

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the relationship between the health status of informal caregivers and the intensity of care they provide in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in rural areas of South Africa. Specifically, the study aims to explore the following aspects:

1. **The relationship between care intensity and caregiver health status**: The study focuses on how factors such as the amount of care provided, the length of caregiving time, whether the caregiver is the primary caregiver, and the degree of dependence of the care recipient affect the number of self-reported chronic illnesses and the self-assessed health status of the caregiver.

2. **The impact of age on the relationship between care intensity and health status**: The study also examines whether there are different patterns of association between care intensity and health status among caregivers of different age groups.

3. **Caregiving responsibilities in a socio-cultural context**: The study considers how caregiving responsibilities are widely distributed across multiple generations in rural South Africa due to the characteristics of family structure and social support networks, how this differs from caregiving situations in high-income countries (HICs), and how these differences affect the health of caregivers.

Through these analyses, the study hopes to provide a basis for understanding how to better support the health of caregivers in resource-limited settings and to provide scientific evidence for the formulation of relevant policies and interventions.