Abstract:Abstract Reaction–diffusion systems are an intensively studied form of partial differential equation, frequently used to produce spatially heterogeneous patterned states from homogeneous symmetry breaking via the Turing instability. Although there are many prototypical “Turing systems” available, determining their parameters, functional forms, and general appropriateness for a given application is often difficult. Here, we consider the reverse problem. Namely, suppose we know the parameter region associated with the reaction kinetics in which patterning is required—we present a constructive framework for identifying systems that will exhibit the Turing instability within this region, whilst in addition often allowing selection of desired patterning features, such as spots, or stripes. In particular, we show how to build a system of two populations governed by polynomial morphogen kinetics such that the: patterning parameter domain (in any spatial dimension), morphogen phases (in any spatial dimension), and even type of resulting pattern (in up to two spatial dimensions) can all be determined. Finally, by employing spatial and temporal heterogeneity, we demonstrate that mixed mode patterns (spots, stripes, and complex prepatterns) are also possible, allowing one to build arbitrarily complicated patterning landscapes. Such a framework can be employed pedagogically, or in a variety of contemporary applications in designing synthetic chemical and biological patterning systems. We also discuss the implications that this freedom of design has on using reaction–diffusion systems in biological modelling and suggest that stronger constraints are needed when linking theory and experiment, as many simple patterns can be easily generated given freedom to choose reaction kinetics.

Optimal network sizes for most robust Turing patterns

Optimal network sizes for most robust Turing patterns

Identifying Network Topologies That Can Generate Turing Pattern.

Turing patterns in network-organized activator–inhibitor systems

Effects of multistability, absorbing boundaries and growth on Turing pattern formation

Robustness of Turing models and gene regulatory networks with a sweet spot

Widespread biochemical reaction networks enable Turing patterns without imposed feedback

Turing patterns mediated by network topology in homogeneous active systems

Beyond activator-inhibitor networks: the generalised Turing mechanism

Turing instabilities are not enough to ensure pattern formation

Free energy dissipation enhances spatial accuracy and robustness of Turing pattern in small reaction-diffusion systems

Feedbacks, Receptor Clustering, and Receptor Restriction to Single Cells yield large Turing Spaces for Ligand-receptor based Turing Models

Pattern formation in a predator-prey model with Allee effect and hyperbolic mortality on networked and non-networked environments

Minimal Control Placement of Networked Reaction-Diffusion Systems Based on Turing Model

Turing patterns in multiplex networks

Impact of non-diffusive interactions on Turing instability

The theory of Turing patterns on time varying networks

Free energy dissipation enhances spatial accuracy and robustness of self-positioned Turing pattern in small biochemical systems

Bespoke Turing Systems

Turing pattern of an SIRI model on large-scale homogeneous and heterogeneous networks