Synchrony dynamics underlie irregular neocortical spiking

Jagruti J. Pattadkal,Ronan Thomas O'Shea,David Hansel,Thibaud Taillefumier,Darrin Brager,Nicholas Priebe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618398
2024-10-16
Abstract:Cortical neurons are characterized by their variable spiking patterns. We challenge prevalent theories for the origin of spiking variability. We examine the specific hypothesis that cortical synchrony drives spiking variability in vivo. Using dynamic clamp, we demonstrate that intrinsic neuronal properties do not contribute substantially to spiking variability, but rather spiking variability emerges from weakly synchronous network drive. With large-scale electrophysiology we quantify the degree of synchrony and its time scale in cortical networks in vivo. We demonstrate that physiological levels of synchrony are sufficient to generate irregular responses found in vivo. Further, this synchrony shifts over timescales ranging from 25 to 200 ms, depending on the presence of external sensory input. Such shifts occur when the network moves from spontaneous to driven modes, leading naturally to a decline in response variability as observed across cortical areas. Finally, while individual neurons exhibit reliable responses to physiological drive, different neurons respond in a distinct fashion according to their intrinsic properties, contributing to stable synchrony across the neural network.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the source of spiking variability in cortical neurons. Specifically, the author challenges the prevailing theory regarding spiking variability, namely that this variability mainly stems from the intrinsic randomness of neurons or the noise of synaptic inputs. Through experimental and theoretical analysis, the author tests a specific hypothesis: that cortical synchrony is the main cause of in vivo spiking variability. ### Main research questions: 1. **Is the spiking variability of cortical neurons mainly caused by intrinsic neuronal properties?** - The author recorded pyramidal neurons in mouse and marmoset cortical slices in vitro using the dynamic clamp technique and found that repeated injections of the same excitatory and inhibitory conductances did not cause significant spiking variability, indicating that intrinsic neuronal properties contribute little to spiking variability. 2. **Does cortical synchrony drive in vivo spiking variability?** - The author further measured the changes in synaptic conductances between different trials in vivo and injected them into in vitro neurons. The results showed that these changes could indeed produce highly variable spiking patterns similar to those observed in vivo, supporting the hypothesis that cortical synchrony is an important source of spiking variability. 3. **Is the level of synchrony under physiological conditions sufficient to generate irregular spiking patterns?** - Through large - scale electrophysiological recordings, the author quantified the degree of synchrony in the cortical network and its time scale and found that the physiological level of synchrony can indeed generate the irregular spiking patterns observed in vivo. 4. **How does the time scale of synchrony affect spiking variability?** - The author found that the time scale of synchrony varies between 25 and 200 milliseconds, depending on the presence or absence of external sensory inputs. When the network changes from the spontaneous mode to the driven mode, synchrony changes, resulting in a decrease in response variability. ### Conclusions: - The spiking variability of cortical neurons is mainly not due to intrinsic neuronal properties but is driven by synchrony generated by network dynamics. - The level of synchrony under physiological conditions is sufficient to generate irregular spiking patterns. - The time scale of synchrony varies under different conditions and affects spiking variability. These findings are of great significance for understanding the function and information - processing mechanism of cortical neural networks.