Red flags for remote cognitive assessment: An expert consensus study using the Delphi method on behalf of the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging

Nathan H.M. Friedman,Sophie Hallot,Inbal Itzhak,Alex Henri-Bhargava,Jacqueline A. Pettersen,Linda Lee,John D. Fisk,Paula McLaughlin,Vladimir Khanassov,Zahinoor Ismail,Morris Freedman,Howard Chertkow,Richard Camicioli,Philippe Desmarais,Megan O'Connell,Maiya R. Geddes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.14.24315468
2024-10-15
Abstract:Remote cognitive diagnostic assessment offers numerous benefits, including increased access to care, but it may not always be appropriate, and guidelines are lacking. Our goal was to develop a clinical tool to determine a patient's suitability for undergoing remote cognitive assessment. A multidisciplinary workgroup, composed of experts in remote assessment, was convened under the auspices of the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging. Delphi, an anonymous group consensus method, was used to determine red flags for remote cognitive diagnostic assessment. The process consisted of one round of flag generation, then two rounds of flag scoring based on effectiveness, reproducibility, and efficiency. In the first round, 11 respondents generated 67 potential flags. In subsequent rounds, 8 and 9 respondents, respectively, scored the flags, yielding 14 red flags that met the predetermined consensus criteria. This research led to the creation of a novel clinical decision-making infographic to support multidisciplinary clinicians in determining a patient's readiness to undergo remote cognitive and behavioral diagnostic assessment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?