Abstract:Background: Destruction of health systems in fragile and conflict-affected states increases civilian mortality. Despite the size, scope, scale and political influence of international security forces intervening in fragile states, little attention has been paid to array of ways they may impact health systems beyond their effects on short-term humanitarian health aid delivery. Methods: Using case studies we published on international security forces' impacts on health systems in Haiti, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Libya, we conducted a comparative analysis that examined three questions: What aspects, or building blocks, of health systems did security forces impact across the cases and what was the nature of these impacts? What forums or mechanisms did international security forces use to interact with health system actors? What policies facilitated or hindered security forces from supporting health systems? Results: We found international security forces impacted health system governance, information systems and indigenous health delivery organizations. Positive impacts included bolstering the authority, transparency and capability of health system leadership. Negative impacts included undermining the impartial nature of indigenous health institutions by using health projects to achieve security objectives. Interactions between security and health actors were primarily ad hoc, often to the detriment of health system support efforts. When international security forces were engaged in health system support activities, the most helpful communication and consultative mechanisms to manage their involvement were ones that could address a wide array of problems, were nimble enough to accommodate rapidly changing circumstances, leveraged the power of personal relationships, and were able to address the tensions that arose between security and health system supporting strategies. Policy barriers to international security organizations participating in health system support included lack of mandate, conflicts between security strategies and health system preservation, and lack of interoperability between security and indigenous health organizations with respect to logistics and sharing information. Conclusions: The cases demonstrate both the opportunities and risks of international security organizations involvement in health sector protection, recovery and reconstruction. We discuss two potential approaches to engaging these organizations in health system support that may increase the chances of realizing these opportunities while mitigating risks.

A global analysis of domestic military policies governing responses to public health emergencies

Civil-military relations: a review of major guidelines and their relevance during public health emergencies

Militaries and global health: peace, conflict, and disaster response

Comparing International Military Response to COVID Utilizing Three Interoperability Frameworks

Military Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis in Latin America: Military Presence, Autonomy, and Human Rights Violations

Global key concepts of civil-military cooperation for disaster management in the COVID-19 pandemic-A qualitative phenomenological scoping review

Quantifying Policy Responses to a Global Emergency: Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Supporting the nation in crisis: the military health system's role in enhancing public health capacity through public-private partnerships

Research on emergency management of global public health emergencies driven by digital technology: A bibliometric analysis

Emergency Powers in Response to COVID-19: Policy Diffusion, Democracy, and Preparedness

Analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons towards a more effective response to public health emergencies

Comparative analysis of state-level policy responses in global health governance: A scoping review using COVID-19 as a case

The Role of Public Health Emergency Management in Biodefense: A COVID-19 Case Study

Assessing Military Mental Health during the Pandemic: A Five Country Collaboration

How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: a global analysis of response patterns

Filling the gaps in the COVID-19 pandemic response: medical personnel in the US military health system

Evolutionary game analysis of multiple subjects in the management of major public health emergencies

A cross-case comparative analysis of international security forces' impacts on health systems in conflict-affected and fragile states

A global analysis of quarantine and isolation policies governing outbreak responses

Logic Analysis of How the Emergency Management Legal System Used to Deal with Public Emerging Infectious Diseases under Balancing of Competing Interests—The Case of COVID-19

The response of the Military Health System (MHS) to the COVID-19 pandemic: a summary of findings from MHS reviews