Noninvasive Monitoring of Changes in Cerebral Hemodynamics During Prolonged Field Care for Hemorrhagic Shock and Hypoxia-Induced Injuries With Portable Diffuse Optical Sensors
Kurtulus Izzetoglu,Shadi N Malaeb,Mert Deniz Polat,Randolph Sinahon,Danielle S Shoshany,Luis M Gomero,Patricia A Shewokis,Meltem Izzetoglu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae157
2024-08-19
Abstract:Introduction: Achieving simultaneous cerebral blood flow (CBF) and oxygenation measures, specifically for point-of-care injury monitoring in prolonged field care, requires the implementation of appropriate methodologies and advanced medical device design, development, and evaluation. The near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) method measures the absorbance of light whose attenuation is related to cerebral blood volume and oxygenation. By contrast, diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) allows continuous noninvasive monitoring of microvascular blood flow by directly measuring the degree of light scattering because of red blood cell (RBC) movement in tissue capillaries. Hence, this study utilizes these two optical approaches (DCS-NIRS) to obtain a more complete hemodynamic monitoring by providing cerebral microvascular blood flow, hemoglobin oxygenation and deoxygenation in hemorrhage, and hypoxia-induced injuries. Materials and methods: Piglet models of hemorrhage and hypoxia-induced brain injury were used with DCS and NIRS sensors placed over the preorbital to temporal skull regions. To induce hemorrhagic shock, up to 70% of the animal's total blood volume was withdrawn through graded hemorrhage serially via a syringe from a femoral artery cannula in 10 mL/kg aliquots over 1 minute every 10 minutes. A second group of animals was subjected to hypoxia for ∼1 hour through graded hypoxia by serial titration from normoxic fraction inspired oxygen of 21% to hypoxic fraction inspired oxygen of 6%. A subset of animals served as sham-controls undergoing anesthesia, instrumentation, and ventilation as the injury groups, yet experiencing no blood loss or hypoxia. Results: We first investigated the relationship between hemorrhagic shock and no shock by using measured biomarkers, including blood flow index from DCS associated with CBF and oxygenated (HbO) and de-oxygenated hemoglobin from NIRS. The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between no shock and hemorrhagic shock (P < .01). The HbO decreased with each blood loss as expected, yet the de-oxygenated hemoglobin was slightly changed. During hypoxia-induced global hypoxic-ischemic injury tests, the CBF results from graded hypoxia were consistent with the response previously measured during hemorrhagic shock. Moreover, HbO decreased when the animal was hypoxic, as expected. A statistical analysis was also conducted to compare the results with those of the sham controls. Conclusions: There is a consistency in blood flow measures in both injury mechanisms (hemorrhagic shock and hypoxia), which is significant as the new prototype system provides similar measures and trends for each brain injury type, suggesting that the optical system can be used in response to different injury mechanisms. Notably, the results support the idea that this optical system can probe the hemodynamic status of local cerebral cortical tissue and provide insight into the underlying changes of cerebral tissue perfusion at the microvascular level. These measurement capabilities can improve shock identification and monitoring of medical management of injuries, particularly hemorrhagic shock, in prolonged field care.