Navigating the Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoff: Federated Survival Analysis with Binning and Differential Privacy

Varsha Gouthamchand,Johan van Soest,Giovanni Arcuri,Andre Dekker,Andrea Damiani,Leonard Wee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.09.24315159
2024-10-09
Abstract:Federated learning (FL) offers a decentralized approach to model training, allowing for data-driven insights while safeguarding patient privacy across institutions. In the Personal Health Train (PHT) paradigm, it is local model gradients from each institution, aggregated over a sample size of its own patients that are transmitted to a central server to be globally merged, rather than transmitting the patient data itself. However, certain attacks on a PHT infrastructure may risk compromising sensitive data. This study delves into the privacy-accuracy tradeoff in federated Cox Proportional Hazards (CoxPH) models for survival analysis by assessing two Privacy-Enhancing Techniques (PETs) added on top of the PHT approach. In one, we implemented a Discretized Cox model by grouping event times into finite bins to hide individual time-to-event data points. In another, we explored Local Differential Privacy by introducing noise to local model gradients. Our results demonstrate that both strategies can effectively mitigate privacy risks without significantly compromising numerical accuracy, reflected in only small variations of hazard ratios and cumulative baseline hazard curves. Our findings highlight the potential for enhancing privacy-preserving survival analysis within a PHT implementation and suggest practical solutions for multi-institutional research while mitigating the risk of re-identification attacks.
Health Informatics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?