Insulin moderates the effects of early life adversity on executive functioning in a sex-specific manner

Aashita Batra,Irina Pokhvisneva,Guillaume Elgbeili,Olivia Ruge,Eamon Fitzgerald,Sachin Patel,Darina Czamara,Michael Meaney,Elisabeth Binder,Patricia Pelufo Silveira
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.08.24315109
2024-10-08
Abstract:Background: Early life adversity (ELA) is associated with altered insulin signaling and altered EF behaviors, in a potentially sex-specific manner. Considering the high co-morbidity between altered metabolism and executive function (EF) problems, we hypothesized that the genetic background associated with altered fasting insulin (FI) and EF could be shared. Methods: Our study used conjunctional false discovery rate (ConjFDR) to identify the shared genetic architecture between FI and two EFs: impulsivity and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We identified the polygenic risk score (PRS) threshold from a FI genome-wide association study (GWAS) that best predicted insulin levels in male and female ALSPAC children [Nmales=1,901, Nfemales=1,834; pt-intial-males= 0.05 (11,121 SNPs), pt-intial-females= 0.15 (27,202 SNPs)], further refining it to only include SNPs significantly associated with insulin levels in children [NSNP-males= 635 SNPs, NSNP-females = 1,449 SNPs]. A phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) was also run to identify EFs associated with the interaction between the refined PRS (rPRS) and early adversity. To investigate the presence of a direct causal relationship between FI and impulsivity in the presence of adversity, we applied mendelian randomization (MR). Results: ConjFDR suggested that environmental factors could be involved in the association between insulin and EFs, as there was no shared genetic background. PheWAS highlighted impulsivity and attention-related outcomes in interaction models between FI rPRS and early adversity. Finally, two-sample MR suggested a causal association between higher fasting insulin levels and impulsive behavior, specifically in females exposed to adversity (p < 0.001). Overall, a sex-specific impulsivity GWAS demonstrated that MYT1L and TSSC1, genes that are associated with motor impulsivity, were enriched only in females. Conclusions: Our study solidifies the evidence that the relationship between high FI and EF is not direct, but rather interacting with ELA exposure, especially in females. Keywords: early life adversity, fasting insulin, executive functions, impulsivity, genetic correlation, mendelian randomization, sex-specific impulsivity GWAS
Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?