Abstract:Background: The decision about whether to approach or avoid a reward while under threat requires balancing competing demands. Sex-specific prioritisations (e.g. mating, maternal care), or generalised prioritisations (e.g. feeding, drinking, sleeping) may differently influence approach-avoidance behaviours based on the level of risk and homeostatic need state of the organism. However, given known sex differences in key aspects that may influence this behaviour, direct comparison of how male and female mice make decisions to approach or avoid a dangerous area while in a fasted state have yet to be conducted. Methods: We conducted several approach-avoidance tasks with varied levels of risk and reward in male and female mice that were either fasted or sated (fed). Mice underwent a light-dark box, elevated plus maze, baited large open field and runway task to assess their approach and avoidance behaviour. Results: In the light-dark box and elevated plus maze, when no reward was available, fasted female mice showed greater approach behaviours than male counterparts. In the baited large open field, when reward was available, both sexes showed increased approach behaviours when fasted. However, when sated, male mice conversely showed greater approach behaviours compared to sated female mice. In the runway task, while sated mice failed to learn, fasted male mice inhibited their reward consumption in response to increased shock intensity; however, fasted female mice were resistant to increased shock intensity. Conclusions: Our study identifies sex differences in decision making behaviour in mice based on satiety state across a number of approach-avoidance tasks. We highlight several nuances of these differences based on reward availability and punishment intensity. These results shine a lens on fundamental differences between the sexes in innate, survival driven behaviours that should be taken into account for future studies.

SEXUAL-DIMORPHISM IN VISUALLY GUIDED APPROACH BEHAVIOR EMERGES UNIQUELY DURING ADOLESCENCE

Context-dependent modulation of natural approach behaviour in mice

Medial Preoptic Area in Mice is Capable of Mediating Sexually Dimorphic Behaviors Regardless of Gender

Sexually dimorphic development in the cortical oscillatory dynamics serving early visual processing

Visual Identification of Conspecifics Shapes Social Behavior in Mice

Sex Differences in Spontaneous Behavior and Cognition in Mice Using an Automated Behavior Monitoring System

A sex-dependent delayed maturation of visual plasticity induced by adverse experiences in early childhood

Cellular evolution of the hypothalamic preoptic area of behaviorally divergent deer mice

Development and sex modulate visuospatial oscillatory dynamics in typically-developing children and adolescents

Automated behavioral analysis reveals that mice employ a bait-and-switch escape mechanism to de-escalate social conflict

Sexual dimorphism in synaptic inputs to the mouse amygdala and orbital cortex

Behavioral transition from attack to parenting in male mice: a crucial role of the vomeronasal system

A Circuit Mechanism for Sexually Dimorphic Control of Aggression

Synaptic plasticity in the medial preoptic area of male mice encodes social experiences with female and regulates behavior toward young

Mating proximity blinds threat perception

Sexually dimorphic control of affective state processing and empathic behaviors

A hypothalamic-amygdala circuit underlying sexually dimorphic aggression

Hunger alters approach-avoidance behaviours differently in male and female mice

P673. Sexual Dimorphism in Social Synchronization of Conditioned Fear

Effects of L-Dopa, SKF-38393, and quinpirole on exploratory, anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors in pubertal female and male mice

Mice employ a bait-and-switch escape mechanism to de-escalate social conflict