Verifying the concordance between motion corrected and conventional MPRAGE for pediatric morphometric analysis

Barat Gal-Er,Yannick Brackenier,Alexandra F Bonthrone,Chiara Casella,Anthony Price,Sophie Arulkumaran,Andrew TM Chew,Chiara Nosarti,Michela Cleri,Pierluigi Di Cio,Alexia Egloff Collado,Mary Rutherford,Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh,Raphael Tomi-Tricot,Shaihan Malik,Lucilio Cordero-Grande,Joseph V Hajnal,Serena J Counsell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.01.616016
2024-10-02
Abstract:Purpose: To validate a retrospective motion correction technique, Distributed and Incoherent Sample Orders for Reconstruction Deblurring using Encoding Redundancy (DISORDER), for pediatric brain morphometry. Methods: Two T1-weighted MPRAGE 3D datasets were acquired at 3T in thirty-seven children, median age 7.75 years; one with conventional linear phase encoding and one using DISORDER. MPRAGE images were scored as motion-free or motion-corrupt. Cortical morphometry and regional brain volumes were measured with FreeSurfer, subcortical grey matter (GM) with FSL-FIRST, and hippocampal volumes with HippUnfold. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine agreement between the 2 MPRAGE acquisitions. Mann-Whitney U was used to test the difference between measures obtained using DISORDER and (i) motion-free and (ii) motion-corrupt conventional MPRAGE data. Results: ICC measures were good/excellent for most subcortical GM (motion-free, 0.75-0.96; motion-corrupt, 0.62-0.98) and regional brain volumes (motion-free 0.47-0.99; motion-corrupt, 0.54-0.99) between conventional MPRAGE and DISORDER data, except for the amygdala and nucleus accumbens (motion-free, 0.38-0.65; motion-corrupt, 0.1-0.42). However, these values were less consistent for motion-corrupt conventional MPRAGE data for hippocampal volumes (motion-free 0.65-0.99; motion-corrupt, 0.11-0.91) and cortical measures (motion-free 0.76-0.98; motion-corrupt, 0.09-0.74). Mann-Whitney U showed percentage differences in measures obtained with motion-corrupt conventional MPRAGE compared to DISORDER data were significantly greater than in those obtained using motion-free conventional MPRAGE data in 22/58 structures. Conclusion: In the absence of motion, morphometric measures obtained using DISORDER are largely consistent with those from conventional MPRAGE data, whereas improved reliability is obtained by DISORDER for motion-degraded scans. This study validates DISORDER for brain morphometric studies in children.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?