Abstract:figure legend Neural networks execute the transformation of inputs into the neural activity that enables the execution of a task. Thus, they have the potential to establish causal relationships between the input, the elements of a circuit, the network activity, and eventually behavior. When the purpose of building a model is to understand the mechanisms that enable behavior in biological circuits, the design of network models should be guided by three principles: (1) biological constraints are necessary (e.g., connectivity), (2) the network activity should match the recorded activity, and (3) the network should be able to perform the task of interest. Machine‐learning‐based training can help accomplish these goals. Due to the staggering complexity of the brain and its neural circuitry, neuroscientists rely on the analysis of mathematical models to elucidate its function. From Hodgkin and Huxley's detailed description of the action potential in 1952 to today, new theories and increasing computational power have opened up novel avenues to study how neural circuits implement the computations that underlie behavior. Computational neuroscientists have developed many models of neural circuits that differ in complexity, biological realism, or emergent network properties. With recent advances in experimental techniques for detailed anatomical reconstructions of large‐scale activity recordings, precise biological data has become more available. The challenge when building network models is to reflect experimental results, either through a high level of detail or by finding an appropriate level of abstraction. Meanwhile, machine learning has facilitated the development of artificial neural networks (ANN), which are trained to perform specific tasks. While they have proven successful at achieving task‐oriented behavior, they are often abstract constructs that differ in many features from the physiology of brain circuits. Thus, it is unclear whether the mechanisms underlying computation in biological circuits can be investigated by analyzing artificial networks that accomplish the same function but differ in their mechanisms. Here, we argue that building biologically realistic network models is crucial to establishing causal relationships between neurons, synapses, circuits, and behavior. More specifically, we advocate for network models that consider the connectivity structure and the recorded activity dynamics while evaluating task performance.

Top-down feedback matters: Functional impact of brainlike connectivity motifs on audiovisual integration

Topographic Property of Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network: from Human Functional Connectivity Network to Artificial Neural Network

Network Model Of Top-Down Influences On Local Gain And Contextual Interactions In Visual Cortex

Comparison Against Task Driven Artificial Neural Networks Reveals Functional Organization of Mouse Visual Cortex

Complex Properties of Training Stimuli Affect Brain Alignment in a Deep Network Model of Mouse Visual Cortex

Neural information processing with feedback modulations.

Unidirectional brain-computer interface: Artificial neural network encoding natural images to fMRI response in the visual cortex

Exploring Brain Effective Connectivity in Visual Perception Using a Hierarchical Correlation Network.

Hierarchical Causality Network: Find the Effective Connectivity in Visual Cortex

Enhancing neural encoding models for naturalistic perception with a multi-level integration of deep neural networks and cortical networks

Do Topographic Deep ANN Models of the Primate Ventral Stream Predict the Perceptual Effects of Direct IT Cortical Interventions?

A unifying framework for functional organization in early and higher ventral visual cortex

Learning cortical hierarchies with temporal Hebbian updates

A Task-Optimized Neural Network Replicates Human Auditory Behavior, Predicts Brain Responses, and Reveals a Cortical Processing Hierarchy

Top-Down Processing: Top-Down Network Combines Back-Propagation with Attention

Local lateral connectivity is sufficient for replicating cortex-like topographical organization in deep neural networks

Neural Dynamics Model of Visual Decision-Making: Learning from Human Experts

Deep Spiking Neural Networks with High Representation Similarity Model Visual Pathways of Macaque and Mouse

Biological constraints on neural network models of cognitive function

Recurrent Feedback Improves Feedforward Representations in Deep Neural Networks

How to incorporate biological insights into network models and why it matters