Abstract:Aims: Early prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is still a huge challenge for patients and clinicians. Recently, a novel cluster-based diabetes classification was proposed which may offer the possibility to solve this problem. In this study, we report our performance of cluster analysis of individuals newly diagnosed with T2DM, our exploration of each subtype's clinical characteristics and medication treatment, and the comparison carried out concerning the risk for diabetes complications and comorbidities among subtypes by adjusting for influencing factors. We hope to promote the further application of cluster analysis in individuals with early-stage T2DM. Methods: In this study, a k-means cluster algorithm was applied based on five indicators, namely, age, body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostasis model assessment-2 insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR), and homeostasis model assessment-2 β-cell function (HOMA2-β), in order to perform the cluster analysis among 567 newly diagnosed participants with T2DM. The clinical characteristics and medication of each subtype were analyzed. The risk for diabetes complications and comorbidities in each subtype was compared by logistic regression analysis. Results: The 567 patients were clustered into four subtypes, as follows: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD, 24.46%), age-related diabetes (MARD, 30.86%), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD, 25.57%), and severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD, 20.11%). According to the results of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and biochemical indices, fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hBG), HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) were higher in SIDD and SIRD than in MARD and MOD. MOD had the highest fasting C-peptide (FCP), 2-hour postprandial C-peptide (2hCP), fasting insulin (FINS), 2-hour postprandial insulin (2hINS), serum creatinine (SCr), and uric acid (UA), while SIRD had the highest triglycerides (TGs) and TyG-BMI. Albumin transaminase (ALT) and albumin transaminase (AST) were higher in MOD and SIRD. As concerms medications, compared to the other subtypes, SIDD had a lower rate of metformin use (39.1%) and a higher rate of α-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI, 61.7%) and insulin (74.4%) use. SIRD showed the highest frequency of use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i, 36.0%) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA, 19.3%). Concerning diabetic complications and comorbidities, the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), dyslipidemia, and hypertension differed significantly among subtypes. Employing logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for unmodifiable (sex and age) and modifiable related influences (e.g., BMI, HbA1c, and smoking), it was found that SIRD had the highest risk of developing DKD (odds ratio, OR = 2.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.125-3.559) and dyslipidemia (OR = 3.550, 95% CI: 1.534-8.215). MOD was more likely to suffer from NAFLD (OR = 3.301, 95%CI: 1.586-6.870). Conclusions: Patients with newly diagnosed T2DM can be successfully clustered into four subtypes with different clinical characteristics, medication treatment, and risks for diabetes-related complications and comorbidities, the cluster-based diabetes classification possibly being beneficial both for prevention of secondary diabetes and for establishment of a theoretical basis for precision medicine.

Subphenotypes of youth-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus and their association with distal symmetrical polyneuropathy

Translating Subphenotypes of Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes from Cohort Studies to Electronic Health Records in the United States

Clinical Characterization of Data-Driven Diabetes Clusters of Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes

Cardiorenal Risk Profiles Among Data-Driven Type 2 Diabetes Sub-Phenotypes: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the China Health and Nutrition Survey

Clinical application of cluster analysis in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Monogenic Diabetes in Youth With Presumed Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the Progress in Diabetes Genetics in Youth (ProDiGY) Collaboration

Clinical Prediction Models Combining Routine Clinical Measures Have High Accuracy in Identifying Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Defined by Maintained Endogenous Insulin Secretion: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study

Identifying subtypes of type 2 diabetes mellitus with machine learning: development, internal validation, prognostic validation and medication burden in linked electronic health records in 420 448 individuals

The First Genome-Wide Association Study for Type 2 Diabetes in Youth: The Progress in Diabetes Genetics in Youth (ProDiGY) Consortium

Genetic architecture and biology of youth-onset type 2 diabetes

Subtypes of Type 2 Diabetes Determined From Clinical Parameters

IDF21-0141 Novel Clusters of Type 2 Diabetes and Their Association with Diabetic Retinopathy: a 3-year follow-up study

Genetic subtypes of prediabetes, healthy lifestyle, and risk of type 2 diabetes

Clinical prediction models combining routine clinical measures identify participants with youth-onset diabetes who maintain insulin secretion in the range associated with type 2 diabetes: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study

Identification of new phenotypes in type 2 diabetes with acute myocardial infarction: toward a precision medicine?

Identification of novel population clusters with different susceptibilities to type 2 diabetes and their impact on the prediction of diabetes

The heterogeneity of youth at risk of diabetes and prediabetes: a latent class analysis of a national sample

Distinct Molecular Signatures of Clinical Clusters in People With Type 2 Diabetes: An IMI-RHAPSODY Study

Identification of Two Novel Subgroups in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Their Association with Clinical Outcomes: A Two-Step Cluster Analysis

Etiologies underlying subtypes of long-standing type 2 diabetes

Type 1 Diabetes Risk Phenotypes Using Cluster Analysis