Exploring Attitudes Toward Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention Prior to Implementation Among Female Sex Workers in Malaysia: Results from a Qualitative Study
Shaylen Foley,Danya E Keene,Roman Shrestha,Shan-Estelle Brown,Kamal Gautam,Ryan Sutherland,Francesca Maviglia,Rumana Saifi,Jeffrey A Wickersham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s413423
2024-04-06
Patient Preference and Adherence
Abstract:Shaylen Foley, 1 Danya E Keene, 1 Roman Shrestha, 2– 4 Shan-Estelle Brown, 5 Kamal Gautam, 2 Ryan A Sutherland, 3 Francesca Maviglia, 3 Rumana Saifi, 4 Jeffrey A Wickersham 3, 4 1 Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; 2 Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; 3 Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; 4 Centre of Excellence for Research in AIDS (CERiA), Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; 5 Department of Anthropology, Rollins College, Winter Park, FL, USA Correspondence: Shaylen Foley, 135 College Street, Suite 323, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA, Tel +419 343-4606, Email Introduction: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective method for prevention of HIV transmission. Female sex workers (FSW) in Malaysia are at substantially increased risk of acquiring HIV compared to the general female population, yet little is known about this population's current HIV prevention practices or acceptance of PrEP. This study aims to inform the culturally relevant implementation of PrEP through the qualitative exploration of (1) the potential need for PrEP in this population and (2) the factors that determine FSW willingness to use oral PrEP. Methods: In-depth, semi-structured interviews (n = 30) were conducted with FSW in English, Malay, or Tamil. Transcribed and translated interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results: FSW express positive interest in PrEP but prefer it as a supplement to condoms, not a replacement. Perceived challenges to PrEP use include cost, adherence, and side effects. Conclusion: The findings suggest that in combination with condom use, PrEP may be an acceptable method of HIV prevention. Effective PrEP rollout may also include condom promotion using a peer-driven model, cost subsidies, and sex work harm reduction and empowerment components. Keywords: sex work, HIV, pre-exposure prophylaxis, Malaysia Female sex workers (FSW) are disproportionally affected by HIV compared to the general population. 1 Compared to the general population, FSW reports having more sex partners and more frequent sexual risk behaviors, putting them at higher risk of both acquiring and transmitting HIV. FSW have been largely underserved in HIV research and practice, particularly with regard to biomedical approaches to prevention. 2 Daily oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention offers the opportunity to curb HIV transmission among FSW in a novel way. Intended for HIV-uninfected individuals at high risk, PrEP has been demonstrated to safely and effectively reduce risk of HIV infection in men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), and serodiscordant heterosexual couples. 3 Although PrEP has already proven to be effective for preventing HIV in FSW, there is limited research on factors related to its implementation in FSW populations. Unlike condoms, which are often subject to negotiation between FSW and their clients, PrEP is an HIV prevention tool that can be used easily and discretely by FSW, taking their PrEP dose at a time of day that is convenient and private for them. 4 Scale-up of PrEP among sex workers is highly promising because it provides FSW with an additional strategy to reduce their risk of acquiring HIV. Current HIV prevention efforts focus on condom promotion and distribution, yet condom use remains suboptimal. Condom use may be inconsistent due to limited agency, client refusal or coercion, sexual or physical violence, criminalization of carrying condoms, offers of higher payment by clients, and attitudes of non-paying partners. 5,6 Research on acceptability of daily oral PrEP among high-risk groups, including FSW, has demonstrated that acceptability is generally high but varies depending on cost, perceived efficacy, and fear of side effects. 7–9 However, these studies have predominately relied on survey-based methods and fail to look in-depth at the factors that may shape PrEP acceptability among FSW. Indeed, previous research has found that the most common PrEP acceptability measures may not be great predictors of actual adherence, as they ignore contextual factors such as agency or competing priorities. 10 Research demonstrates that FSW decision-making is calculated and often involves juggling a variety of interests, but little is known about factors that might determine FSW willingness to use PrEP. Challenges related to -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal