Cost-effectiveness of a 4 days-a-week triple therapy in persons living with HIV: an ancillary study of the ANRS 170 QUATUOR noninferiority trial

Gilles Hejblum,Samih Daher,Paul Moulaire,Karine Amat,Sidonie Lambert-Niclot,Clotilde Allavena,Christine Katlama,Karine Lacombe,Diane Ponscarme,Jade Ghosn,Severine Gibowski,Jean-Claude Alvarez,Jacqueline Capeau,Laurence Morand-Joubert,Dominique Costagliola,Pierre De Truchis,Roland Landman,Lambert Assoumou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.26.24314433
2024-09-27
Abstract:Background. ANRS 170 QUATUOR study ( ) demonstrated the noninferiority of a triple antiretroviral therapy (ART) taken 4 days a week (4/7-days) compared to a triple therapy taken 7 days a week (7/7-days) for persons living with HIV and with suppressed viremia. We aimed at investigating corresponding cost-effectiveness issues. Methods. All persons involved in the primary analysis of the QUATUOR noninferiority trial were considered (N=636, 318 per arm) in this cost-effectiveness study. Time horizon was the first 48 weeks of the trial. Effectiveness was considered as the noninferiority of the 4/7-days strategy, main criterion of the trial primary analysis. Direct health resource costs (year2022€) were considered and included costs for ART, laboratory tests, co-medications, hospitalizations, and medical consultations. Analyses were based on 10,000 simulations replicating the trial. Additional analyses explored the national impact of spreading the 4/7-days strategy all over France. Sensitivity analyses included considering treatment success as effectiveness, and various proportions of persons adopting the 4/7-days strategy. Findings. The mean individual total costs amounted to € 5,049 [95% confidence interval: 4,798–5,345] and € 8,089 [7,706–8,527] in the 4/7-days and 7/7-days arm, respectively. Corresponding ART costs were € 3,678 [3,593–3,763] and € 6,450 [6,301–6,596], respectively (p<0.0001), and constituted the single cost element with a statistical difference between the two strategies. Considering noninferiority as the effectiveness criterion in a health economic perspective, the 4/7-day strategy provided average savings of € 3,013 [2829–3196] in ART costs per individual and per year. Adopting the 4/7-days regimen in 20% of the potential recipients in France was estimated to provide annual savings of € 61,752,467 [61,569,005; 61,925,136]. Interpretation. The 4/7-day strategy dominates the 7/7-day strategy since it spares substantial ART costs while maintaining treatment effectiveness. Study results support generalizing the adoption of 4/7-days triple ART regimens in France, when possible.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?