A unique interplay of access and selection shapes peritoneal metastasis evolution in colorectal cancer

Emma CE Wassenaar,Alexander N Gorelick,Wei-Ting Hung,David M Cheek,Emre Kucukkose,I-Hsiu Lee,Martin Blohmer,Sebastian Degner,Peter Giunta,Rene MJ Wiezer,Mihaela G Raicu,Inge Ubink,Sjoerd J Klaasen,Nico Lansu,Emma V Watson,Ryan B Corcoran,Genevieve Boland,Gad Getz,Geert JPL Kops,Dejan Juric,Jochen K Lennerz,Djamila Boerma,Onno Kranenburg,Kamila Naxerova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.25.614736
2024-09-27
Abstract:Whether metastasis in humans can be accomplished by most primary tumor cells or requires the evolution of a specialized trait remains an open question. To evaluate whether metastases are founded by non-random subsets of primary tumor lineages requires extensive, difficult-to-implement sampling. We have realized an unusually dense multi-region sampling scheme in a cohort of 26 colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases, reconstructing the evolutionary history of on average 28.8 tissue samples per patient with a microsatellite-based fingerprinting assay. To assess metastatic randomness, we evaluate inter- and intra-metastatic heterogeneity relative to the primary tumor and find that peritoneal metastases are more heterogeneous than liver metastases but less diverse than locoregional metastases. Metachronous peritoneal metastases exposed to systemic chemotherapy show significantly higher inter-lesion diversity than synchronous, untreated metastases. Projection of peritoneal metastasis origins onto a spatial map of the primary tumor reveals that they often originate at the deep-invading edge, in contrast to liver and lymph node metastases which exhibit no such preference. Furthermore, peritoneal metastases typically do not share a common subclonal origin with distant metastases in more remote organs. Synthesizing these insights into an evolutionary portrait of peritoneal metastases, we conclude that the peritoneal-metastatic process imposes milder selective pressures onto disseminating cancer cells than the liver-metastatic process. Peritoneal metastases' unique evolutionary features have potential implications for staging and treatment.
Genetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the evolutionary characteristics and randomness of peritoneal metastasis in colorectal cancer. Specifically, researchers hope to evaluate whether peritoneal metastasis is generated by specific sub - clones (cell lines with special metastatic capabilities) in the primary tumor or by most cells in the primary tumor in a random manner through multi - regional sampling and high - density genetic analysis. This involves exploring multiple aspects such as the selection pressure on cells during the peritoneal metastasis process, the location of the origin of metastasis, and the relationship with distant metastasis. ### Main research questions: 1. **Randomness of the metastasis process**: Is peritoneal metastasis formed by a non - random subset of cells in the primary tumor? If so, do these cells have special metastatic capabilities? 2. **Selection pressure**: How does the selection pressure on cancer cells during peritoneal metastasis compare with that during liver metastasis? 3. **Origin of metastasis**: Which part of the primary tumor are the cells of peritoneal metastasis mainly derived from? 4. **Relationship with other metastases**: Is there a common sub - clone origin between peritoneal metastasis and metastases in other sites (such as the liver, lymph nodes)? ### Research methods: - **Multi - regional sampling**: Researchers performed multi - regional sampling on the primary tumors and peritoneal metastases of 26 colorectal cancer patients, analyzing an average of 28.8 tissue samples per patient. - **Microsatellite fingerprint analysis**: Polyguanine fingerprinting was used to reconstruct the cancer evolution history of each patient. - **Genetic diversity analysis**: The Root Diversity Score (RDS) was calculated to quantify the genetic diversity between different metastatic foci. ### Main findings: - **Genetic diversity**: Peritoneal metastasis is more heterogeneous genetically than liver metastasis, but more homogeneous than local - area metastasis. - **Selection pressure**: The peritoneal metastasis process exerts less selection pressure on the spreading cancer cells, while the liver metastasis process imposes more stringent selection pressure. - **Origin of metastasis**: Peritoneal metastasis usually originates from the deep - invasive edge of the primary tumor, while liver metastasis and lymph node metastasis do not have this preference. - **Sub - clone relationship**: Peritoneal metastasis usually does not share a common sub - clone origin with metastases in distant organs. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the biological characteristics of peritoneal metastasis and provide new insights for clinical staging and treatment strategies.