Lipopolysaccharide Induces Trained Innate Immune Tolerance in the Heart Through Interferon Signaling in a Model of Stress-Induced Cardiomyopathy

Kenji Rowel Q Lim,Junedh M Amrute,Attila Kovacs,Abhinav Diwan,David L Williams,Douglas L Mann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.24.614798
2024-09-26
Abstract:Background: Although the ability of the heart to adapt to environmental stress has been studied extensively, the molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for cardioprotection are not yet fully understood. Methods: We administered Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists or a diluent to wild-type mice and assessed their potential to induce cardiac protection against injury from a high intraperitoneal dose of isoproterenol (ISO) administered 7 days later. Cardioprotective effects were analyzed through serum cardiac troponin I levels, immune cell profiling via flow cytometry, echocardiography, and multiomic single-nuclei RNA and ATAC sequencing. Results: Pretreatment with the TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS), but not TLR1/2 or TLR3 agonists, conferred cardioprotection against ISO, as demonstrated by reduced cardiac troponin I leakage, decreased inflammation, preservation of cardiac structure and function, and improved survival. Remarkably, LPS-induced tolerance was reversed by β-glucan treatment. Multiomic analysis showed that LPS-tolerized hearts had greater chromatin accessibility and upregulated gene expression compared to hearts treated with LPS and β-glucan (reverse-tolerized). The LPS tolerance was associated with upregulation of interferon response pathways across various cell types, including cardiac myocytes and stromal cells. Blocking both type 1 and type 2 interferon signaling eliminated LPS-induced tolerance against ISO, while pretreatment with recombinant type 1 and 2 interferons conferred cardiac protection. Multiomic sequencing further revealed enhanced cytoprotective signaling in interferon-treated hearts. Analysis of cell-cell communication networks indicated increased autocrine signaling by cardiac myocytes, as well as greater paracrine signaling between stromal cells and myeloid cells, in LPS-tolerized versus reverse-tolerized hearts. Conclusions: LPS pretreatment confers cardiac protection against ISO-induced injury through TLR4 mediated type 1 and 2 interferon signaling, consistent with trained innate immune tolerance. The observation that LPS-induced protection in cardiac myocytes involves both cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms underscores the complexity of innate immune tolerance in the heart, warranting further investigation into this cardioprotective phenotype.
Immunology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?