Severe infection among young infants in Dhaka, Bangladesh: effect of case definition on incidence estimates

Alastair Fung,Cole Heasley,Lisa G Pell,Diego G Bassani,Prakesh S Shah,Shaun K Morris,Davidson H Hamer,Mohammad Shahidul Islam,Abdullah Al Mahmud,Eleanor Pullenayegum,Samir K Saha,Rashidul Haque,Md Iqbal Hossain,Chun-Yuan Chen,Abby Emdin,Karen O'Callaghan,Miranda G Loutet,Shamima Sultana,S M Masum Billah,S M Abdul Gaffar,Enamul Karim,Sharika Sayed,Sultana Yeasmin,Md Mahbubul Hoque,Tahmeed Ahmed,Shafiqul A Sarker,Daniel E Roth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.24.24314067
2024-09-26
Abstract:Introduction: Heterogeneity in definitions of severe infection, sepsis and serious bacterial infection (SBI) in young infants limits the comparability of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of infection prevention and treatment interventions. To inform the design of severe infection prevention RCTs for young infants in low-resource settings, we estimated the incidence of severe infection in an observational cohort of Bangladeshi infants aged 0-60 days and examined the effect of variations in case definitions on incidence estimates. Methods: In 2020-2022, 1939 infants born generally healthy were enrolled at two hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Severe infection cases were identified through up to 12 scheduled community health worker home visits from 0-60 days of age or through caregiver self-referral. The primary severe infection case definition combined physician documentation of standardized clinical signs and/or diagnosis of sepsis/SBI and either a positive blood culture or parenteral antibiotic treatment for >=5 days. Incidence rates were estimated for the primary severe infection definition, the World Health Organization (WHO) definition of possible SBI, blood culture-confirmed infection, and five alternative severe infection definitions. Results: Severe infection incidence per 1000 infant-days was 1.2 (95% CI 0.97-1.4) using the primary definition, 0.84 (0.69-1.0) using the WHO definition of possible SBI, and 0.026 (0.0085-0.081) using blood culture-confirmed infection. One-third of cases met the primary criteria for severe infection through physician diagnosis of sepsis/SBI rather than the standardized clinical signs and 85% were identified following caregiver self-referral despite frequent scheduled study visits. Conclusion: Severe infection incidence in young infants varied considerably by case definition. Using a clinical sign-based severe infection definition may miss a substantial proportion of cases identified by physician diagnosis of sepsis/SBI. In settings where health facilities are accessible, and caregivers seek care for infant illness, frequently scheduled home assessments by study personnel to identify severe infection in infants may not be necessary.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?