Abstract:Background: Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) is a promising form of non-invasive neuromodulation characterized by a rich parameter space that includes intensity, duration, duty cycle and pulsing strategy. The effect and interaction of these parameters to affect human brain activity is poorly understood. A better understanding of how parameters interact is critical to advance LIFU as a potential therapeutic. Objective/Hypothesis: To determine how different parameters, including intensity, duration, and duty cycle interact to produce neuromodulation effects in the human brain. Further, this study assesses the effect of pulsing versus continuous ultrasound. We hypothesize that higher duty cycles will confer excitation. Increasing intensity or duration will increase the magnitude of effect. Pulsing LIFU will not be more effective than continuous wave ultrasound. Methods: N = 18 healthy human volunteers underwent 20 different parameter combinations that included a fully parametrized set of two intensities (ISPPA: 6 & 24 W/cm2), five duty cycles (1, 10, 30, 50, 70%) and two durations (100, 500 msec) with a constant pulse repetition frequency of 1 kHz delivered concurrently with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the primary motor cortex (M1). Four of these parameter combinations were also delivered continuously, matched on the number of cycles. Motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude was the primary outcome measure. All parameter combinations were collected time-locked to MEP generation. Results: There was no evidence of excitation from any parameter combination. 3 of the 24 parameter sets resulted in inhibition. The parameter set that resulted in the greatest inhibition (~ 30%) was an intensity of 6W/cm2 with a duty cycle of 30% and a duration of 500 msec. A three-way ANOVA revealed an interaction of intensity and duty cycle. The analysis of continuous versus pulsed ultrasound revealed a 3-way interaction of intensity, pulsing, and the number of cycles such that under the 6W/cm2 condition higher cycles of pulsed ultrasound resulted in inhibition whereas lower number of cycles using continuous LIFU resulted in inhibition. Conclusions: LIFU to M1 in humans, in the range employed, either conferred inhibition or had no effect. Significant excitation was not observed. In general, lower intensity looks to be more efficacious for inhibition that depends on duration. Finally, pulsed ultrasound looks to be more effective for inhibition as compared to continuous wave after controlling for total energy delivered.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore how different parameters of low - intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) interact with each other to affect the neuromodulation effect in the human brain. Specifically, the researchers hope to evaluate the impact of these parameters on the neural activity of the human primary motor cortex (M1) by adjusting the intensity, duration, and duty cycle of LIFU, as well as comparing pulsed and continuous ultrasonic waves. The main hypotheses of the study include: 1. **A higher duty cycle will induce excitation**: Based on predictions from small - animal experiments and theoretical models, the researchers hypothesize that a higher duty cycle will lead to an excited state of neurons. 2. **Increasing intensity or duration will enhance the effect**: Whether it is excitation or inhibition, increasing the total energy of LIFU (by increasing intensity or prolonging duration) will enhance its neuromodulation effect. 3. **Pulsed LIFU will not be more effective than continuous - wave ultrasound**: Under the condition of controlling the total energy, pulsed LIFU will not be more effective than continuous - wave form in producing neuromodulation effects. To verify these hypotheses, the researchers designed 20 different parameter combinations, including two different spatial - peak pulse - average intensities (ISPPA: 6 W/cm² and 24 W/cm²), five duty cycles (1%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%), and two durations (100 milliseconds and 500 milliseconds), and carried out experiments at a constant pulse repetition frequency (1 kHz). In addition, four continuous - wave conditions were also tested, which were matched with the pulsed conditions in terms of the total number of cycles. Through these experiments, the researchers hope to better understand the interactions between LIFU parameters, thereby providing a more solid foundation for LIFU as a potential treatment tool.

Examination of low-intensity focused ultrasound parameters for human neuromodulation

Effects of Noninvasive Low-Intensity Focus Ultrasound Neuromodulation on Spinal Cord Neurocircuits in Vivo

A Comprehensive Review of Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Parameters and Applications in Neurologic and Psychiatric Disorders

Low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: An intensity escalation phase I safety and feasibility study

Neuromodulatory Responses Elicited by Intermittent Versus Continuous Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Rats

Excitatory-inhibitory modulation of transcranial focus ultrasound stimulation on human motor cortex

Optimized ultrasound neuromodulation for non-invasive control of behavior and physiology

Neuromodulation Effect of Very Low Intensity Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation on Multiple Nuclei in Rat Brain

A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation

Time course of the effects of low-intensity transcranial ultrasound on the excitability of ipsilateral and contralateral human primary motor cortex

Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Neuromodulation of a Rodent's Spinal Cord Suppresses Motor Evoked Potentials

Low-intensity focused ultrasound to the insula differentially modulates the heartbeat-evoked potential: A proof-of-concept study

Analysis of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Beam Profile Sensitivity for Neuromodulation of the Human Brain

Neuromodulation with Ultrasound: Hypotheses on the Directionality of Effects and a Community Resource

Interactive effect between transcranial focused ultrasound and transcranial magnetic stimulation on human motor cortex

Focused Ultrasound modulates dopamine in a mesolimbic reward circuit

359 Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound to Human Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Insula Attenuates Measures of Central Sensitization

Numerical investigation of the energy distribution of Low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation for hippocampus

Neuromodulation Effects of Ultrasound Stimulation under Different Parameters on Mouse Motor Cortex

Clinical efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in Parkinson's disease with cognitive impairment

Dynamic changes in human brain connectivity following ultrasound neuromodulation