Wastewater surveillance overcomes socio-economic limitations of laboratory-based surveillance when monitoring disease transmission: the South African experience during the COVID-19 pandemic

Gillian Maree,Fiona Els,Yashena Naidoo,Laven Naidoo,Phemelo Mahamuza,Mokgaetji Macheke,Nkosenhle Ndlovu,Said Rachida,Sibonginkosi Maposa,Setshaba Taukobong,Chinwe Iwu-Jaja,Kathleen O'Reilly,Mukhlid Yousif,Kerrigan McCarthy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.20.24314039

2024-09-22

Abstract:Wastewater and environmental surveillance has been promoted as a communicable disease surveillance tool because it overcomes inherent biases in laboratory-based communicable disease surveillance. Yet, little empirical evidence exists to support this notion, and it remains largely an intuitive, though highly plausible hypothesis. Our interdisciplinary uses WES data to show evidence for underreporting of SARS-CoV-2 in the context of measurable and statistically significant associations between economic conditions and SARS-CoV-2 incidence and testing rates. We obtained geolocated, anonymised, laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases, wastewater SARS-CoV-2 viral load data and socio-demographic data for Gauteng Province, South Africa. We spatially located all data to create a single dataset for sewershed catchments served by two large wastewater treatment plants. We conducted epidemiological, persons infected and principal component analysis to explore the relationships between variables. Overall, we demonstrate the co-contributory influences of socio-economic indicators on access to SARS-CoV-2 testing and cumulative incidence, thus reflecting that apparent incidence rates mirror access to testing and socioeconomic considerations rather than true disease epidemiology. These analyses demonstrate how WES provides valuable information to contextualise and interpret laboratory-based epidemiological data. Whilst it is useful to have these associations established for SARS-CoV-2, the implications beyond SARS-CoV-2 are legion for two reasons, namely that biases inherent in clinical surveillance are broadly applicable across pathogens and all pathogens infecting humans will find their way into wastewater albeit in varying quantities. WES should be implemented to strengthen surveillance systems, especially where economic inequalities limit interpretability of conventional surveillance data.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the limitations present in laboratory-based clinical detection infectious disease surveillance systems, especially in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. Specifically, the paper uses Wastewater and Environmental Surveillance (WES) data to demonstrate how socioeconomic factors influence the detection rate and cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in Gauteng Province, South Africa, and explores how wastewater monitoring, as a supplementary tool, can overcome the limitations of traditional laboratory surveillance systems.

The authors integrated clinical data, wastewater monitoring data, and socioeconomic data to analyze two sewersheds with different socioeconomic backgrounds, in order to explain and quantify the relationship between these variables and the burden of SARS-CoV-2 disease. The study aims to demonstrate that wastewater monitoring can serve as a necessary surveillance tool to help interpret clinical surveillance data and reveal the discrepancies between actual infection rates and reported case numbers. This helps to more accurately assess the epidemic situation, particularly in cases where limited resources or socioeconomic inequalities render conventional surveillance data unreliable.