Surveillance and control of neglected zoonotic diseases: methodological approaches to studying Rift Valley Fever, Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever and Brucellosis at the human-livestock-wildlife interface across diverse agricultural systems in Uganda

Dennison Kizito,Sam Tweed,Joseph Mutyaba,Nackson Babi,Swaib Lule,Gladys Nakanjako Kiggundu,Rory Gibb,Charity Angella Nassuna,Ronald Ssali Ogwal,Ebenezer Paul,Mercy Haumba,Collins Agaba,Phionah Katushabe,Eric Morris Enyel,Stephen Balinandi,Lydia Franklinos,Naomi Fuller,Leah Owen,Laura Ferguson,Deo Birungi Ndumu,Musa Sekammatte,Atimnedi Patrick,Luke Nyakarahuka,Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka,Ibrahim Abubakar,Nigel Field,Janet Seeley,Julius Julian Lutwama,COHRIE-Uganda Team
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.17.24313808
2024-10-01
Abstract:Background Zoonoses are of public health importance with most major emerging diseases originating in animal populations. Rift Valley Fever (RVF), Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) and Brucellosis are circulating in Uganda causing frequent outbreaks, but gaps exist in the understanding of transmission dynamics, community perspectives and effective mitigation strategies of these diseases. With increasing human-livestock-wildlife interaction in Uganda's biodiverse cattle corridor, this study protocol outlines an integrated One Health model to determine the burden of RVF, CCHF and Brucellosis, identify key vectors and reservoirs and assesses the impact of social and policy factors on disease distribution. Methods A series of mixed-methods cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys across six conservation areas experiencing high human-livestock-wildlife interaction spanning Uganda's Cattle Corridor: Queen Elizabeth National Park, Bwindi-Mgahinga Impenetrable Forest, Lake Mburo-Nakivaale, Murchison Falls, Kidepo Valley and Pian Upe Game Reserve. In selected villages household surveys comprise questionnaires, focus-group discussions and in-depth interviews to determine drivers of disease risk with blood-sampling of human population. Questionnaires provide detail on livestock practices and blood-sampling is conducted on cattle, sheep, pigs and goats. Targeted sampling of vectors in these localities including mosquitos, ticks and small mammals using environmental traps and on-host collection. Specimens taken from nearby large wildlife include blood sampling and nasal swabs. Serological testing using indirect ELISA and molecular testing using real-time PCR was conducted to determine disease status of RVF, CCHF and Brucellosis across humans, livestock and wildlife with eco-epi modelling and qualitative analyses used to inform risks and drivers of disease. Results Baseline survey data and blood specimens were obtained from 2894 humans residing in 1602 households across 96 villages in 6 conservation areas of Uganda. A further 379 community members participated in focus group discussions and key informant interviews with 978 reformed and active poachers across 4 conservation areas. 3692 livestock were sampled including 1925 cattle, 1409 goats, 282 sheep and 76 pigs from 358 herds. Vector data were collected for 18236 ticks, 53480 mosquitoes and 768 rodents. 241 large wildlife were sampled including buffalo, kobs, zebras, waterbucks, topi and hartebeest. 127 Community One Health Volunteers (COHVs) were enlisted to monitor and detect outbreaks in the study sites. Conclusions This paper outlines a comprehensive One Health approach to studying neglected zoonotic diseases integrating molecular epidemiology, social sciences and community participatory approaches involving humans, livestock, vectors and wildlife across 6 conservation areas in Uganda. It will inform interventions to enhance the surveillance and control of RVF, CCHF and Brucellosis including strengthening outbreak preparedness and response.
Epidemiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Address This paper aims to address the knowledge gaps in the transmission dynamics, community perspectives, and effective mitigation strategies of three neglected zoonotic diseases (RVF, CCHF, and brucellosis) among humans, livestock, and wildlife in Uganda. Specifically: 1. **Disease Burden Assessment**: Evaluate the prevalence and geographic distribution of RVF, CCHF, and brucellosis among humans, livestock, and wildlife through comprehensive sampling. 2. **Transmission Mechanism Study**: Identify key transmission vectors and hosts, and understand the ecological and behavioral drivers of these diseases. 3. **Social and Policy Impact**: Analyze the impact of social and policy factors on disease distribution, including gender differences, market usage, land use changes, etc. 4. **Community Engagement and Monitoring**: Establish a network of community health volunteers to monitor and report disease outbreaks, enhancing response capabilities. ### Research Background The semi-arid regions of Uganda, known as the "cattle corridor," are areas with diverse ecological and social environments where frequent interactions occur between humans, livestock, and wildlife. RVF, CCHF, and brucellosis frequently outbreak in this region, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the substantial impact of these diseases on human health and socio-economics, they have long been neglected, resulting in significant gaps in understanding their transmission mechanisms and control strategies. ### Research Methods 1. **Selection of Study Sites**: Six protected areas were selected, including Queen Elizabeth National Park, Bwindi-Mgahinga Impenetrable Forest, Lake Mburo-Nakivale, Murchison Falls, Kidepo Valley, and Pian Upe Game Reserve. These sites represent the largest protected areas in Uganda, covering diverse ecological environments. 2. **Data Collection**: A mixed-methods approach was used, including household surveys, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and sampling of livestock, wildlife, and vectors. Data collection was conducted during both dry and rainy seasons to capture seasonal variations. 3. **Laboratory Testing**: Serological and molecular testing using indirect ELISA and real-time PCR techniques were conducted to determine the disease status of humans, livestock, and wildlife. 4. **Data Analysis**: Combined eco-epidemiological modeling and qualitative analysis were used to assess risks and drivers. ### Conclusion This study, through an integrated One Health approach, combines molecular epidemiology, social sciences, and community engagement methods to enhance the monitoring and control capabilities of RVF, CCHF, and brucellosis, thereby strengthening outbreak preparedness and response.