Characterization of MET exon 14 skipping in pancancer.
Fei Li,Jing Chen,Xiaoyan Zhang,Dongxiao Yang,Liang Xia,Dazhong Wang,Kai Jin,Jianhua Zhu,Yu Fang,Chunyang Wang,Tonghui Ma,Xingxiang Pu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e20530
IF: 45.3
2022-06-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e20530 Background: MET exon 14 skipping ( METex14) is characterized oncogenic that possesses susceptibility to targeted inhibitors. We retrospectively investigated a Chinese Pan-cancer cohort to characterize METex14 alterations and co-mutation. Methods: We screened tumor tissues or body fluids of a pan-cancer patients by DNA-based next-generation sequencing assay (Genetron Health) from 2017 to 2020. And distribution of co-mutation with METex14 was analyzed. Results: 233 samples from 187 patients (190 tissues and 43 circulating tumor DNA) were identified with METex14. Average age of these METex14 patients was 67.84 ± 12.19 years old, indicating they were characterized by advanced age. The cancer distribution involved METex14 was 95.72% of lung cancer (179 cases), 3.21% of brain tumors (4 glioma blastoma, 1 anaplastic astrocytoma and 1 ependymoma), 0.535% of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (1 case) and 0.535% of sarcoma (1 case). Referring to different transcripts (NM_001127500.1/2 or NM_000245.2), a total of 68 distinct sequence variants of METex14 were identified spanning functional regions: 31 forms in splice donor site (SD, 148 cases, including 1 case of D1010H), 5 in splice acceptor site (SA, 5 cases), 13 in poly-pyrimidine tract (PPT, 15 cases), 19 cover PPT and SA (19 cases). In non-lung cancers, 5 of 8 cases were detected of METex14 variation in SD site. Among the driver coexisting cases of lung cancer, METex14 samples mainly coexisted with MET amplification, EGFR driver mutations and functional fusions. Co-mutation cases with MET amplification (13) and SEMA3D-MET fusion (1) may benefit from MET inhibitors, which may be the same as the samples of METex14 alone. 13 of METex14 cases occurred with MDM2 and 9 of CDK4 amplification, respectively. There were 2 of METex14 cases coexisted with EGFR 19del or L858R, which may benefit from combination or sequential therapies of MET inhibitor and EGFR TKIs. In addition, 2 of METex14 cases were detected with functional fusions (1 ALK-EML4, 1 KIFI5B-RET), resulting in potential benefit from combination of corresponding targeted agents. Among non-lung cancer cases, 2 of 8 case had coexistence of METex14 and MET amplification, 6 of 8 patients had coexistence of METex14 and TP53, similar phenomenon was also observed in lung cancer samples. Conclusions: Here we reported diverse METex14 alterations in a Chinese pan-cancer cohort that contribute to oncogenic transformation. METex14 mutations of pan-cancer mainly occurred in SD site. TP53 was its main co-mutant gene among pan-cancers, and MET amplification was also observed.
oncology