Abstract:BackgroundDNA isolation and PCR amplification from molluscan taxa is considered as problematic because polysaccharides in tissue and mucus presumably co-precipitate with the DNA and inhibit the activity of DNA polymerase. In the present study we tested two common extraction methods on specimens from the mollusc collection of the Natural History Museum Vienna (NHMW). We analysed a broad variety of taxa covering a large temporal span (acquisition years 1877 to 1999), which distinguishes our study from previous ones where mostly fresh material was used. We also took other factors into account: effects of sample age, effects of formaldehyde treatment and taxon-specific problems. We used several primer combinations to amplify amplicons of different lengths of two mitochondrial genes: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and 16S rRNA gene (16S).ResultsOverall PCR success was 43 % in the 576 extractions (including all primer combinations). The smallest amplicon (~240 bp) showed the best results (49 % positive reactions), followed by the 400 bp amplicon (40.5 %). Both short sections yielded significantly better results than the 700 bp long amplicon (27 %). Comparatively, the Gen-ial-First, All-tissue DNA-Kit—extraction method performed significantly better than Promega-Tissue and Hair Extraction Kit. Generally, PCR success is age-dependent. Nonetheless, we were able to obtain the longest amplicon even from 137-year-old material. Importantly, formaldehyde traces did not totally inhibit amplification success, although very high concentrations did.ConclusionsMuseum material has gained importance for DNA analysis in recent years, especially for DNA barcoding projects. In some cases, however, the amplification of the standard barcoding region (partial sequence of the COI) is problematic with old material. Our study clearly shows that the COI barcoding region could be amplified in up to 49 % of PCRs (varying with amplicon length), which is, for museum samples, quite a high percentage. The difference between extraction methods was minimal and we recommend using an established kit for a first attempt because experience and routine in handling might be more important than slight performance differences of the various kits. Finally, we identify fixation, storage, sample conservation and documentation of the specimens’ history rather than the DNA extraction method to be the most crucial factors for PCR success.

Towards large-scale museomics projects: a cost-effective and high-throughput extraction method for obtaining historical DNA from museum insect specimens

A Minimally Morphologically Destructive Approach for DNA Retrieval and Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing of Pinned Historic Dipteran Vector Species

Successful application of ancient DNA extraction and library construction protocols to museum wet collection specimens

High-throughput sequencing of insect specimens with sub-optimal DNA preservation using a practical, plate-based Illumina-compatible Tn5 transposase library preparation method

To bee, or not to bee? One leg is the question

Minimally destructive hDNA extraction method for retrospective genetics of pinned historical Lepidoptera specimens

Performance of commonly requested destructive museum samples for mammalian genomic studies

More than skin and bones: Comparing extraction methods and alternative sources of DNA from avian museum specimens

DNA analysis of molluscs from a museum wet collection: a comparison of different extraction methods

GoEnrich: creating high quality genomic DNA resources from limited voucher specimen tissues or museum specimens of at-risk species for conservation-friendly use in the validation of environmental DNA assays

A DNA Extraction Method for Insects From Sticky Traps: Targeting a Low Abundance Pest, Phthorimaea absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), in Mixed Species Communities

Maximizing efficiency in sedimentary ancient DNA analysis: a novel extract pooling approach

Simultaneous Barcode Sequencing of Diverse Museum Collection Specimens Using a Mixed RNA Bait Set

Extraction of highly degraded DNA from ancient bones, teeth and sediments for high-throughput sequencing

An SPRI beads-based DNA purification strategy for flexibility and cost-effectiveness

Sequence capture phylogenomics of historical ethanol‐preserved museum specimens: Unlocking the rest of the vault

Can non-destructive DNA extraction of bulk invertebrate samples be used for metabarcoding?

Development of an Easy and Cost-Effective Method for Non-Invasive Genotyping of Insects

A strategy for a high enrichment of insect mitochondrial DNA for mitogenomic analysis

Ancient DNA extraction methods for herbarium specimens: When is it worth the effort?

Optimising recovery of DNA from minimally invasive sampling methods: Efficacy of buccal swabs, preservation strategy and DNA extraction approaches for amphibian studies