Protection of vaccine boosters and prior infection against mild/asymptomatic and moderate COVID-19 infection in the UK SIREN healthcare worker cohort: October 2023 to March 2024

Peter D Kirwan,Sarah D Foulkes,Katie Munro,Dominic Sparkes,Jasleen Singh,Amanda Henry,Angela Dunne,Jean Timeyin,Sophie Russell,Jameel Khawam,Debbie Blick,Ashley D Otter,Nipunadi Hettiarachchi,Michelle Cairns,Christopher H Jackson,Shaun Seaman,Colin S Brown,SIREN Study Group,Ana Atti,Jasmin Islam,Andre Charlett,Daniela De Angelis,Anne M Presanis,Victoria Jane Hall,Susan Hopkins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.24313477
2024-09-12
Abstract:To estimate the protection of COVID-19 vaccine boosters against mild/asymptomatic and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection over a 6-month period of XBB.1.5 and JN.1 variant circulation. Multi-state model applied to cohort study, adjusted for vaccination, prior infection, and demographic covariates. National Health Services (NHS) hospitals in the UK. Healthcare worker cohort including 2,867 eligible people with >6 months since a previous booster who tested fortnightly for SARS-CoV-2 between October 2023 and March 2024 and completed symptoms questionnaires. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) of vaccine boosters received in October 2023 (baseline: booster >6 months prior), and durability of protection from a recent (past 6 months) previous infection (baseline: last infection >2 years prior) against mild/asymptomatic and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mild symptoms included acute respiratory symptoms for <5 days, moderate symptoms included influenza-like illness, acute respiratory symptoms for 5+ days, or sick-leave. VE and acquired protection were estimated from the multi-state model as: 1 - adjusted hazard ratio. Receipt of a COVID-19 bivalent original/BA.4-5 or monovalent XBB.1.5 booster during October 2023. Half of eligible participants (1,422) received a booster during October 2023 (280 bivalent, 1,142 monovalent) and 536 (19%) had at least one PCR-confirmed infection over the study period. For the monovalent booster, VE against infection was 44.2% (95% confidence interval 21.7 to 60.3%) at 0-2 months, and 24.1% (-0.7 to 42.9%) at 2-4 months post-vaccination, with no evidence of protection by 4-6 months. For the bivalent booster, VE against infection was 15.1% (-55.4 to 53.6%) at 0-2 months and 4.2% (-46.4 to 37.3%) at 2-4 months. VE (monovalent or bivalent) against moderate infection was 39.7% (19.9 to 54.6%), and against mild/asymptomatic infection was 14.0% (-12.1 to 34.0%). Controlling for vaccination, compared to those with an infection >2 years prior, infection within the past 6 months was associated with 58.6% (30.3 to 75.4%) increased protection against moderate infection, and 38.5% (5.8 to 59.8%) increased protection against mild/asymptomatic infection. Monovalent XBB.1.5 boosters provided short-term protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly against moderate symptoms. Vaccine formulations which target the circulating variant may be suitable for inclusion in seasonal vaccination campaigns among healthcare workers.
Epidemiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the evaluation of the protective effectiveness of different types of COVID-19 booster shots (including monovalent XBB.1.5 and bivalent original/BA.4-5 vaccines) against mild/asymptomatic and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK SIREN healthcare worker cohort during the prevalence of XBB.1.5 and JN.1 variants. The study analyzed data from October 2023 to March 2024 using a multi-state model, adjusting for the effects of vaccination, prior infection, and other demographic covariates. The primary aim of the study is to estimate the overall protective effectiveness of the two booster shots and their differences over a 6-month period, and to explore the impact of recent infection on protective effectiveness.