Connecting genomic and proteomic signatures of amyloid burden in the brain

Raquel Puerta MSc,Itziar de Rojas PhD,Pablo Garcia-Gonzalez MSc,Claudia Olive MSc,Oscar Sotolongo-Grau PhD,Ainhoa Garcia-Sanchez MSc,Fernando Garcia-Gutierrez MSc,Laura Montrreal,Juan Pablo Tartari,Angela Sanabria PhD,Vanesa Pytel PhD,Carmen Lage MD,Ines Quintela PhD.,Nuria Aguilera,Eloy Rodriguez-Rodriguez MD, PhD,Emilio Alarcon-Martin MSc,Adelina Orellana PhD,Pau Pastor MD, PhD,Jordi Perez-Tur PhD,Gerard Pinol-Ripoll PhD,Adolfo Lopez de Munian MD PhD,Jose Maria Garcia-Alberca MD, PhD,Jose Luis Royo PhD,Maria Bullido PhD,Victoria Alvarez PhD,Luis Miguel Real PhD,Arturo Corbaton Anchuelo MD, PhD,Dulcenombre Gomez-Garre PhD,Maria Teresa Martinez Larrad MD, PhD,Emilio Franco-Macias,Pablo Mir MD, PhD,Miguel Medina PhD.,Raquel Sanchez-Valle MD, PhD,Oriol Dols-Icardo PhD,Maria Eugenia Saez PhD,Angel Carracedo PhD,Lluis Tarraga MSc,Montse Alegret PhD,Sergi Valero PhD,Marta Marquie MD, PhD,Merce Boada MD, PhD,Pascual Sanchez Juan MD, PhD,Jose Enrique Cavazos PhD,Alfredo Cabrera PhD,Amanda Cano PhD,Agustin Ruiz MD, PhD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.06.24313124
2024-09-06
Abstract:Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) has a high heritable component characteristic of complex diseases, yet many of the genetic risk factors remain unknown. We combined genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on amyloid endophenotypes measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) as surrogates of amyloid pathology, which may be helpful to understand the underlying biology of the disease. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of GWAS of CSF Aβ42 and PET measures combining six independent cohorts (n=2,076). Due to the opposite effect direction of Aβ, phenotypes in CSF and PET measures, only genetic signals in the opposite direction were considered for analysis (n=376,599). Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated and evaluated for AD status and amyloid endophenotypes. We then searched the CSF proteome signature of brain amyloidosis using SOMAscan proteomic data (Ace cohort, n=1,008) and connected it with GWAS results of loci modulating amyloidosis. Finally, we compared our results with a large meta-analysis using publicly available datasets in CSF (n=13,409) and PET (n=13,116). This combined approach enabled the identification of overlapping genes and proteins associated with amyloid burden and the assessment of their biological significance using enrichment analyses. Results: After filtering the meta-GWAS, we observed genome-wide significance in the rs429358-APOE locus and nine suggestive hits were annotated. We replicated the APOE loci using the large CSF-PET meta-GWAS and identified multiple AD-associated genes as well as the novel GADL1 locus. Additionally, we found a significant association between the AD PRS and amyloid levels, whereas no significant association was found between any Aβ, PRS with AD risk. CSF SOMAscan analysis identified 1,387 FDR-significant proteins associated with CSF Aβ42 levels. The overlap among GWAS loci and proteins associated with amyloid burden was very poor (n=35). The enrichment analysis of overlapping hits strongly suggested several signalling pathways connecting amyloidosis with the anchored component of the plasma membrane, synapse physiology and mental disorders that were replicated in the large CSF-PET meta-analysis. Conclusions: The strategy of combining CSF and PET amyloid endophenotypes GWAS with CSF proteome analyses might be effective for identifying signals associated with the AD pathological process and elucidate causative molecular mechanisms behind the amyloid mobilization in AD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?