Evaluating the Risk of Cardiovascular Adverse Events and Appendicitis After COVID-19 Diagnosis in Adults in the United States: Implications of the Start of Follow-Up

J. Bradley Layton,Arnstein Lindaas,Stella G. Muthuri,Patricia C. Lloyd,Morgan M. Richey,Joann F. Gruber,Hai Lyu,Mollie M. McKillop,Lisa S. Kowarski,Christine Bui,Shelby S. Fisher,Tainya C. Clarke,Angela S. Cheng,Zhiruo Wan,Pablo Freyria Duenas,Yangping Chen,Timothy Burrell,Minya Sheng,Azadeh Shoaibi,Yoganand Chillarige,Jeffrey Beers,Mary S. Anthony,Richard A. Forshee,Steven A. Anderson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.05.24313134
2024-09-06
Abstract:Purpose: This study evaluated the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis and adverse events (AEs), including cardiovascular AEs and appendicitis, in US adults before the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines. Real-world studies of AEs after COVID-19 suggest that diagnoses of AEs and COVID-19 frequently occur on the same day and may be a source of bias. Methods: Cohort and self-controlled risk interval (SCRI) designs were used in 2 US administrative claims data sources—Merative™ MarketScan® (ages 18-64 years) and Medicare (ages ≥ 65 years). AEs included stroke (nonhemorrhagic and hemorrhagic), acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis/pericarditis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), unusual-site and common-site thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, and appendicitis. In cohort analyses, weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) compared adults with a COVID-19 diagnosis and matched comparators. In SCRI analysis, relative incidences (RIs) and 95% CIs compared risk and reference windows within individuals. Analyses were performed starting follow-up on Time 0 and Day 1. Results: For cardiovascular AEs, all estimates starting follow-up on Day 1 were above 1.0 in both data sources. For cohort analyses, the strongest associations were for inpatient PE in both databases: MarketScan, HR=8.65 (95% CI, 6.06-12.35), Medicare HR=3.06 (95% CI, 2.88-3.26). For SCRI analyses, the strongest association in MarketScan was for DIC: RI=32.28 (95% CI, 17.06-61.09) and in Medicare was for myocarditis/pericarditis: RI=4.53 (95% CI, 3.89-5.27). AEs diagnosed concurrently with COVID-19 (ie, on Time 0) were common; including Time 0 in follow-up/risk windows resulted in higher RIs, as well as higher HRs for some AEs. However, some AEs (eg, stroke) were more common on Time 0 in the comparator group resulting in lower HRs. Conclusion: COVID-19 diagnoses had moderate to strong associations with cardiovascular AEs and weak or inconsistent associations with appendicitis, although estimates varied by design and methodology.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?