Online group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for stroke survivors: a study of fidelity of delivery within the Wellbeing After Stroke study.

Hannah Foote,Audrey Bowen,Sarah Cotterill,Emma Patchwood
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.05.24313107
2024-09-06
Abstract:Objectives: To explore whether practitioners can deliver the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy based Wellbeing After Stroke intervention with fidelity to both the clinical protocol and the Acceptance and Commitment therapy model. Design: Observational fidelity study, embedded within the Wellbeing After Stroke study. Setting: online groups. UK. Participants: Practitioners employed by the Stroke Association, trained to deliver the intervention. Measures: 1) a bespoke Wellbeing After Stroke fidelity tool to assess fidelity to dose, duration and content of intervention sessions, self completed by practitioners and a subset completed by researchers based on video recordings. We calculated interrater reliability of researchers and practitioners. 2) Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Fidelity Measure to assess fidelity to the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy model, completed by researchers on the subset of recorded sessions. Results: Seven practitioners delivered the Wellbeing After Stroke intervention to three groups of stroke survivors. The planned dose of the intervention was delivered, with duration slightly longer than planned. Practitioners delivered the intervention with high fidelity to protocol: 92 to 100% of content delivered, as measured by the Wellbeing After Stroke fidelity tool, once reliability was established. Some practitioners delivered the intervention with fidelity to the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy model. Conclusions: Trained and supervised practitioners can deliver an online, group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy based intervention to stroke survivors with high fidelity to protocol. Improving training may increase consistency with the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy model. The ACT Fidelity Measure can be used to measure consistency of delivery of protocolised, group interventions, but adaptations would increase suitability to context.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?