One-Sided Matching Portal (OSMP): a tool to facilitate rare disease patient matchmaking

Matthew Osmond,E. Magda Price,Orion J Buske,Mackenzie Frew,Madeline Couse,Taila Hartley,Conor Klamann,Hannah G. B. H. Le,Jenny Xu,Delvin So,Anjali Jain,Kevin Lu,Kevin Mo,Hannah Wyllie,Erika Wall,Hannah G Driver,Warren Cheung,Ana S.A. Cohen,Emily G. Farrow,Isabelle Thiffault,Care4Rare Canada Consortium,Andrei Turinsky,Tomi Pastinen,Michael Brudno,Kym M Boycott
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.03.24313012
2024-09-04
Abstract:Background: Genomic matchmaking - the process of identifying multiple individuals with overlapping phenotypes and rare variants in the same gene - is an important tool facilitating gene discoveries for unsolved rare genetic disease (RGD) patients. Current approaches are two-sided, meaning both patients being matched must have the same candidate gene flagged. This limits the number of unsolved RGD patients eligible for matchmaking. A one-sided approach to matchmaking, in which a gene of interest is queried directly in the genome-wide sequencing data of RGD patients, would make matchmaking possible for previously undiscoverable individuals. However, platforms and workflows for this approach have not been well established. Results: We released a beta version of the One-Sided Matching Portal (OSMP), a platform capable of performing one-sided matchmaking queries across thousands of participants stored in genomic databases. The OSMP returns variant-level and participant-level information on each variant occurrence (VO) identified in a queried gene and displays this information through a customizable data table. A workflow for one-sided matchmaking was developed so that researchers could effectively prioritize the many VOs returned from a given query. This workflow was then tested through pilot studies where two sets of genes were queried in over 2,500 individuals: 130 genes that were newly associated with disease in OMIM, and 178 candidate genes that were not yet associated with a described disease-gene association in OMIM. These pilots both returned a large number of initial VOs (12,872 and 20,308, respectively), however the workflow successfully filtered out over 99.8% of these VOs before they were sent for review by a patient′s clinician. Filters on participant-level information, such as variant zygosity, participant phenotype, and whether a variant was also present in unaffected participants were especially effective in this workflow at reducing the number of false positive matches. Conclusions: As demonstrated through the two pilot studies, one-sided matchmaking queries can be efficiently performed using the OSMP. The availability of variant-level and participant-level data is key to ensuring this approach is practical for researchers. In the future, the OSMP will be connected to additional RD databases to increase the accessibility of matchmaking to unsolved RGD patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?