Abstract:Background: Considerable investments are being made in commercial electronic prescribing systems (e-prescribing) in many countries. Few studies have measured or evaluated their effectiveness at reducing prescribing error rates, and interactions between system design and errors are not well understood, despite increasing concerns regarding new errors associated with system use. This study evaluated the effectiveness of two commercial e-prescribing systems in reducing prescribing error rates and their propensities for introducing new types of error.Methods and Results: We conducted a before and after study involving medication chart audit of 3,291 admissions (1,923 at baseline and 1,368 post e-prescribing system) at two Australian teaching hospitals. In Hospital A, the Cerner Millennium e-prescribing system was implemented on one ward, and three wards, which did not receive the e-prescribing system, acted as controls. In Hospital B, the iSoft MedChart system was implemented on two wards and we compared before and after error rates. Procedural (e.g., unclear and incomplete prescribing orders) and clinical (e.g., wrong dose, wrong drug) errors were identified. Prescribing error rates per admission and per 100 patient days; rates of serious errors (5-point severity scale, those >= 3 were categorised as serious) by hospital and study period; and rates and categories of postintervention "system-related'' errors (where system functionality or design contributed to the error) were calculated. Use of an e-prescribing system was associated with a statistically significant reduction in error rates in all three intervention wards (respectively reductions of 66.1% [95% CI 53.9%-78.3%]; 57.5% [33.8%-81.2%]; and 60.5% [48.5%-72.4%]). The use of the system resulted in a decline in errors at Hospital A from 6.25 per admission (95% CI 5.23-7.28) to 2.12 (95% CI 1.71-2.54; p<0.0001) and at Hospital B from 3.62 (95% CI 3.30-3.93) to 1.46 (95% CI 1.20-1.73; p<0.0001). This decrease was driven by a large reduction in unclear, illegal, and incomplete orders. The Hospital A control wards experienced no significant change (respectively -12.8% [95% CI -41.1% to 15.5%]; -11.3% [-40.1% to 17.5%]; -20.1% [-52.2% to 12.4%]). There was limited change in clinical error rates, but serious errors decreased by 44% (0.25 per admission to 0.14; p = 0.0002) across the intervention wards compared to the control wards (17% reduction; 0.30-0.25; p = 0.40). Both hospitals experienced system-related errors (0.73 and 0.51 per admission), which accounted for 35% of postsystem errors in the intervention wards; each system was associated with different types of system-related errors.Conclusions: Implementation of these commercial e-prescribing systems resulted in statistically significant reductions in prescribing error rates. Reductions in clinical errors were limited in the absence of substantial decision support, but a statistically significant decline in serious errors was observed. System-related errors require close attention as they are frequent, but are potentially remediable by system redesign and user training. Limitations included a lack of control wards at Hospital B and an inability to randomize wards to the intervention.

Understanding technology-related prescribing errors for system optimisation: the Technology-Related Error Mechanism (TREM) classification

Understanding Prescribing Errors for System Optimisation: the Technology-Related Error Mechanism Classification

Longitudinal Study of the Manifestations and Mechanisms of Technology-Related Prescribing Errors in Pediatrics.

Medication errors related to computerized provider order entry systems in hospitals and how they change over time: A narrative review

The Safety of Electronic Prescribing: Manifestations, Mechanisms, and Rates of System-Related Errors Associated with Two Commercial Systems in Hospitals.

Hybrid electronic record: An error reduction strategy for diverse medical prescription formats

A cluster randomized trial evaluating electronic prescribing in an ambulatory care setting

Short- and Long-Term Effects of an Electronic Medication Management System on Paediatric Prescribing Errors

Immediate and Long-Term Effects of an Electronic Medication Management System on Paediatric Prescribing Errors: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial with One-Year Follow-Up

Medication Errors in Pediatric Emergency Departments

Variables Associated With Medication Errors in Pediatric Emergency Medicine

Prescribing errors in hospital practice

Does Computerized Provider Order Entry Reduce Prescribing Errors for Hospital Inpatients? A Systematic Review

Paediatric medication incident reporting: a multicentre comparison study of medication errors identified at audit, detected by staff and reported to an incident system

Effects of Two Commercial Electronic Prescribing Systems on Prescribing Error Rates in Hospital In-Patients: a Before and after Study.

A machine learning–based clinical decision support system to identify prescriptions with a high risk of medication error

A Case Report Of Medication Knowledge Translation In China

Accuracy of medication histories derived from an Australian cloud-based repository of prescribed and dispensed medication records

An Analysis of the Safety of Medication Ordering Using Typo Correction within an Academic Medical System

A Case-Study of Metoclopramide Prescription Error : A Grim Reminder

Developing a process to measure actual harm from medication errors in paediatric inpatients: From design to implementation