Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy plus dalpiciclib and exemestane for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: A prospective pilot study

Yu Zhang,Shuo Cao,Nan Niu,Huilian Shan,Jinqi Xue,Guanglei Chen,Yongqing Xu,Jianqiao Yin,Chao Liu,Lisha Sun,Xiaofan Jiang,Meiyue Tang,Qianshi Xu,Mingxuan Jia,Xu Zhang,Zhenyong Zhang,Qingfu Zhang,Jianfei Wang,Ailin Li,Yongliang Yang,Caigang Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.31.24312890
2024-09-01
Abstract:Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy only result in trivial pathological complete response rates and moderate objective response rates (ORR) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, more promising alternatives are urgently needed. With proven synergistic effect of cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor and radiotherapy in preclinical studies, this pilot study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) followed by dalpiciclib and exemestane in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. This was a single-arm, non-controlled prospective pilot study. Treatment-naïve patients with unilateral HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer received neoadjuvant radiotherapy (24Gy/3F) followed by dalpiciclib and exemestane for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with residual cancer burden (RCB) score of 0-I. Key secondary endpoints included ORR, biomarker analysis, and safety. All 12 enrolled patients completed the study treatment and surgery. Two (16.7%) of them achieved the RCB 0-I with the ORR of 91.7% (11/12). Analyses of tumor specimens showed significant increase of infiltrating T cells rather than alteration of PD-L1 positive immune cells. The most common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (66.7%) and leukopenia (25.0%), but no grade 4-5 AE or death occurred. Our results suggested neoadjuvant SBRT followed by dalpiciclib and exemestane are effective and tolerable, and provides novel insights for the neoadjuvant treatment of HR+/HER2- breast cancer, which may be considered as an alternative to patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?