Abstract:The RAS family of GTPases (HRAS, KRAS, NRAS) continue to present formidable challenges to the design of compounds that successfully and specifically target oncogenic RAS mutant populations in cancer. Although recent advances have led to the successful development of inhibitors specific to KRAS G12C (such as Sotorasib [Amgen] and Adagrasib [Mirati Therapeutics]), ongoing efforts seek to develop additional targeted inhibitors for oncogenic mutants of KRAS. Development of new KRAS targeted inhibitors requires the understanding of how a mutation impacts the accessibility of key residues within the protein, along with how each candidate compound interacts with populations of mutant and wild-type proteins. Proteomic analyses, typically comprising peptide-based methods to confirm compound localization or quantify binding kinetics, represent a key validation step for each phase of the inhibitor development process. However, these methods may not always provide a clear picture of how effectively the compound binds to the protein, how specific the compound is to the target residue, and how concentration or incubation time may impact these factors. To address this, we have developed a novel assay to evaluate target engagement in vitro employing top-down proteomics, which entails the analysis of intact protein molecules and their modified forms (proteoforms). By analyzing intact labeled or compound-treated recombinant KRAS4B proteins, we can directly visualize and precisely characterize each species within a sample. This method allows us to easily detect nonspecific binding, identify targeting of incorrect residues, and characterize unanticipated compound reaction products within a short LC-MS run, all facilitated by targeted MS2 fragmentation. Moreover, we have developed complementary methods for RAS proteoform quantitation, allowing for the evaluation of compound engagement to all proteoforms with greater accuracy than traditional peptide-based methods. We first performed a proof-of-concept experiment using a panel of KRAS4B G12D_C118S proteins with selected residues modified to cysteine to evaluate reactivity to maleimide-biotin over time. We then applied our optimized top-down assay to determine the engagement of targeted covalent inhibitors Sotorasib and Adagrasib with KRAS WT, G12C, or G13C in both the active (GppNHp) and inactive (GDPβS) states. Finally, we selected three compounds from a large-scale screen against a UCSF Small Molecule Discovery Center compound library and evaluated each for specificity to KRAS4B G13C over KRAS4B WT and KRAS4B G12C. Our results show the concentration dependence of target engagement and directly map compound binding location(s) without disrupting the protein's primary structure. Moreover, our ability to target discrete compound additions for top-down MS2 fragmentation provides context and order of preferential labeling of KRAS4B. Our hope is that this methodology may help accelerate the identification of new successful targeted inhibitors for KRAS and other RAS isoforms by the greater RAS community. Citation Format: Robert A. D'Ippolito, Caroline J. DeHart, Dana Rabara, Maria Abreu Blanco, Emily Alberico, Nitya Ramakrishnan, Stephanie Widmeyer, Simon Messing, David Turner, Michelle Arkin, Anna Maciag, Andrew Stephen, Dominic Esposito, Frank McCormick, Dwight V. Nissley. A top-down proteomic assay to evaluate KRAS4B-compound engagement [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Targeting RAS; 2023 Mar 5-8; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2023;21(5_Suppl) nr A018.

design of Ras isoform selective binders

A Proteomic Approach Identifies Isoform-Specific and Nucleotide-Dependent RAS Interactions

Bifunctional Small Molecule Ligands of K-Ras Induce Its Association with Immunophilin Proteins

K-Ras G-domain binding with signaling lipid phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-phosphate (PIP2): membrane association, protein orientation, and function

Structural modifications and kinetic effects of KRAS interactions with HRAS and NRAS: an in silico comparative analysis of KRAS mutants

Computationally designed sensors detect endogenous Ras activity and signaling effectors at subcellular resolution

Reversible Small Molecule pan-Ras Inhibitors Display Tunable Affinity for the Active and Inactive forms of Ras.

Inhibition of K-Ras4B-plasma Membrane Association with a Membrane Microdomain-Targeting Peptide

Abstract A018: A top-down proteomic assay to evaluate KRAS4B-compound engagement

Characterizing Conformational Ensemble of H‐, K‐, and N‐Ras Using Accelerated Molecular Dynamics and Wide‐Angle X‐ray Solution Scattering (WAXS)

Delineating the RAS Conformational Landscape

Inhibition of RAS-driven signaling and tumorigenesis with a pan-RAS monobody targeting the Switch I/II pocket

One Step Closer to Targeting RAS.

BRET-based RAS biosensors that show a novel small molecule is an inhibitor of RAS-effector protein-protein interactions

Computer-Aided Drug Design Boosts RAS Inhibitor Discovery

Exploring the Selective Mechanism of Inhibitors Towards Different Subtypes of Class I PI3K

RAS G-domains allosterically contribute to the recognition of lipid headgroups and acyl chains

Abstract LB060: Engineering KRAS mutation-specific affinity binders: A new frontier in cancer research

Modeling receptor flexibility in the structure-based design of KRASG12C inhibitors

RAS G-domains Fine-Tune the Sorting of Phosphatidylserine Acyl Chains in the Plasma Membrane

Isomer-sourced structure iteration methods for in silico development of inhibitors: Inducing GTP-bound NRAS-Q61 oncogenic mutations to an "off-like" state