Abstract:Abstract Genetic interactions, a phenomenon whereby combinations of mutations lead to unexpected effects, reflect how cellular processes are wired and play an important role in complex genetic diseases. Understanding the molecular basis of genetic interactions is crucial for deciphering pathway organization as well as understanding the relationship between genetic variation and disease. Several putative molecular mechanisms have been linked to different genetic interaction types. However, differences in genetic interaction patterns and their underlying mechanisms have not yet been compared systematically between different functional gene classes. Here, differences in the occurrence and types of genetic interactions are compared for two classes, gene-specific transcription factors (GSTFs) and signaling genes (kinases and phosphatases). Genome-wide gene expression data for 63 single and double deletion mutants in baker’s yeast reveals that the two most common genetic interaction patterns are buffering and inversion. Buffering is typically associated with redundancy and is well understood. In inversion, genes show opposite behavior in the double mutant compared to the corresponding single mutants. The underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Although both classes show buffering and inversion patterns, the prevalence of inversion is much stronger in GSTFs. To decipher potential mechanisms, a Petri Net modeling approach was employed, where genes are represented as nodes and relationships between genes as edges. This allowed over 9 million possible three and four node models to be exhaustively enumerated. The models show that a quantitative difference in interaction strength is a strict requirement for obtaining inversion. In addition, this difference is frequently accompanied with a second gene that shows buffering. Taken together, these results provide a mechanistic explanation for inversion. Furthermore, the ability of transcription factors to differentially regulate expression of their targets provides a likely explanation why inversion is more prevalent for GSTFs compared to kinases and phosphatases. Author Summary The relationship between genotype and phenotype is one of the major challenges in biology. While many previous studies have identified genes involved in complex genetic diseases, there is still a gap between genotype and phenotype. One of the difficulties in filling this gap has been attributed to genetic interactions. Large-scale studies have revealed that genetic interactions are widespread in model organisms such as baker’s yeast. Several molecular mechanisms have been proposed for different genetic interaction types. However, differences in occurrence and underlying molecular mechanism of genetic interactions have not yet been compared between gene classes of different function. Here, we compared genetic interaction patterns identified using gene expression profiling for two classes of genes: gene specific transcription factors and signaling related genes. We modelled all possible molecular networks to unravel putative molecular differences underlying different genetic interaction patterns. Our study proposes a new mechanistic explanation for a certain genetic interaction pattern that is more strongly associated with transcription factors compared to signaling related genes. Overall, our findings and the computational methodologies implemented here can be valuable for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying genetic interactions.

Genetic suppression interactions are highly conserved across genetic backgrounds

A genome wide dosage suppressor network reveals genetic robustness and a novel mechanism for Huntington's disease

The ability of transcription factors to differentially regulate gene expression is a crucial component of the mechanism underlying inversion, a frequently observed genetic interaction pattern

Autosomal suppression of sex-ratio meiotic drive influences the dynamics of X and Y chromosome coevolution

Complex modifier landscape underlying genetic background effects

Karyotype engineering by chromosome fusion leads to reproductive isolation in yeast

Genome-scale analysis of interactions between genetic perturbations and natural variation

Overdominant Mutations Restrict Adaptive Loss of Heterozygosity at Linked Loci

Understanding and predicting genome-wide synthetic lethal genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using domain genetic interactions

Discovering Genetic Modulators of the Protein Homeostasis System through Multilevel Analysis

Interaction of Genetic Variants Activates Latent Metabolic Pathways in Yeast

Extreme antagonism arising from gene-environment interactions

Feature Identification of Compensatory Gene Pairs Without Sequence Homology in Yeast

Sheltered load in fungal mating-type chromosomes revealed by fitness experiments

Partial gene suppression improves identification of cancer vulnerabilities when CRISPR-Cas9 knockout is pan-lethal

3' Untranslated regions mediate transcriptional interference between convergent genes both locally and ectopically in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Genetic differentiation in the MAT-proximal region is not sufficient for suppressing recombination in Podospora anserina

Disruption of IFNγ, PRF1, GZMB, or LYST results in reduced suppressive function in human CD8+ T cells

Genes involved in protein folding and chromatin organization buffer genetic variation

Epistatic relationships reveal the functional organization of yeast transcription factors.

Copy number variation alters local and global mutational tolerance