Phylodynamics beyond neutrality: The impact of incomplete purifying selection on viral phylogenies and inference

Katia Koelle,David Rasmussen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.610037
2024-08-28
Abstract:Viral phylodynamics focuses on using sequence data to make inferences about the population dynamics of viral diseases. These inferences commonly include estimation of growth rates, reproduction numbers, and times of most recent common ancestor. With few exceptions, existing phylodynamic inference approaches assume that all observed and ancestral viral genetic variation is fitness-neutral. This assumption is commonly violated, with a large body of analyses indicating that fitness varies substantially among genotypes circulating viral populations. Here, we focus on fitness variation arising from deleterious mutations, asking whether incomplete purifying selection of deleterious mutations has the potential to bias phylodynamic inference. We use simulations of an exponentially growing population to explore how incomplete purifying selection distorts tree shape and shifts the distribution of non-neutral mutations over trees. Consistent with previous results, we find that incomplete purifying selection strongly shapes the distribution of mutations while only weakly impacting tree shape. Despite incomplete purifying selection shifting the distribution of mutations, we find little discernible bias in estimates of the viral growth rate and times of the most recent common ancestor. Our results reassuringly indicate that existing phylodynamic inference approaches may not yield biased epidemiological estimates in the face of incomplete purifying selection. More work is needed to assess the generalizability of these findings.
Evolutionary Biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?