Abstract:Accumulating studies show that the host microbiome influences the development or progression of many diseases. The eukaryotic virome, as a key component of the microbiome, plays an important role in host health and disease in humans and animals, including research animals designed to model human disease. To date, the majority of research on the microbiome has focused on bacterial populations, while less attention has been paid to the viral component. Members of the eukaryotic virome interact with the commensal bacterial microbiome through trans-kingdom interactions, and influence host immunity and disease phenotypes as a collective microbial ecosystem. As such, differences in the virome may affect the reproducibility of animal models, and supplementation of the virome may enhance the translatability of animal models of human disease. However, there are minimal empirical data regarding differences in the virome of mice from different commercial sources. Our hypotheses were that the mice obtained from pet store sources and lab mice differ in their eukaryotic virome, and that lab mice from different sources would also have different viromes. To test this hypothesis, the ViroCap platform was used to characterize the eukaryotic virome in multiple tissues of mice from different sources including three sources of laboratory mice and two pet stores. As expected, pet store mice harbored a much greater diversity within the virome compared to lab mice. This included an ostensibly novel norovirus strain identified in one source of these mice. Viruses found in both laboratory and pet store populations included four strains of endogenous retroviruses and murine astrovirus with the latter being restricted to one source of lab mice. Considering the relatively high richness virome within different samples from healthy humans, these data suggest that mouse models from alternative sources may be more translational to the human condition. Moreover, these data demonstrate that, by characterizing the eukaryotic murine virome from different sources, novel viruses may be identified for use as field strains in biomedical research.

Tameness selection pressure affects gut virome diversity in mice

Enhanced tameness by from gut microbiota of selectively bred mice

Association of tameness and sociability but no sign of domestication syndrome in mice selectively bred for active tameness

The gut virome is associated with stress-induced changes in behaviour and immune responses in mice

A missense mutation in RRM1 contributes to animal tameness

Alterations in the diversity and composition of mice gut microbiota by lytic or temperate gut phage treatment

Comparative Metagenomic Analysis of Bacteriophages and Prophages in Gnotobiotic Mouse Models

Extensive gut virome variation and its associations with host and environmental factors in a population-level cohort

Selective Colonization Ability of Human Fecal Microbes in Different Mouse Gut Environments

Convergence of gut phage communities but not bacterial communities following wild mouse bacteriophage transplantation into captive house mice

Wild Mouse Gut Microbiota Promotes Host Fitness and Improves Disease Resistance

The enemy from within: a prophage of Roseburia intestinalis systematically turns lytic in the mouse gut, driving bacterial adaptation by CRISPR spacer acquisition

Whole-genome sequencing reveals the genetic mechanisms of domestication in classical inbred mice

Fecal virome transplantation is sufficient to alter fecal microbiota and drive lean and obese body phenotypes in mice

Host genetic determinants of the gut microbiota of wild mice

Characterization of the Eukaryotic Virome of Mice from Different Sources

Microbiota regulate social behaviour via stress response neurons in the brain

Bacteriophages allow selective depletion of gut bacteria to produce a targeted-bacterium-depleted mouse model

The gut virome and the relevance of temperate phages in human health

Sex- and age-specific variation of gut microbiota in Brandt’s voles

The gut microbiome influences host diet selection behavior