Abstract:Most biological networks have been proposed to possess modular organization, which increases the robustness, flexibility, and stability of networks. Many clustering methods have been used in mining biological data and partitioning complex networks into functional modules. Most of these methods require presetting the number of modules and therefore can potentially obtain biased results. The Markov clustering method (MCL) and the simulated annealing module-detection method (SA) eliminate this requirement and can objectively separate relatively dense subgraphs. In this paper, we compared these two module-detection methods for three types of biological data: protein family classification, microarray clustering, and modularity of metabolic networks. We found that these two methods show differential advantages for different biological networks. In the case of the gene network based on Affymetrix microarray spike data, MCL exactly identified the same number of groups and same contents in each group set by the spike data. In the case of the gene network derived from actual expression data, although neither of the two methods can perfectly recover the natural classification, MCL performs slightly better than SA. However, with increased random noise added to the gene expression values, SA generates better modular structures with higher modularity. Next we compared the modularization results of MCL and SA for protein family classification and found the modules detected by SA could not be well matched with the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP database), which suggests that MCL is ideally suited to the rapid and accurate detection of protein families. In addition, we used both methods to detect modules in the metabolic network of E. coli. MCL gives a trivial clustering, which generates biologically insignificant modules. In contrast, SA detects modules well corresponding to the KEGG functional classification. Moreover the modularity for several other metabolic networks detected by SA is also much higher than that by MCL. In summary, MCL is more suited to modularize relatively complete and definite data, such as a protein family network. In contrast, SA is less sensitive to noise such as experimental error or incomplete data and outperforms MCL when modularizing gene networks based on microarray data and large scale metabolic networks constructed from incomplete databases.

Testing and overcoming the limitations of Modular Response Analysis

MPRAnalyze: Statistical Framework for Massively Parallel Reporter Assays

A multifactorial evaluation framework for gene regulatory network reconstruction

Optimizing sequence design strategies for perturbation MPRAs: a computational evaluation framework

A Modular Framework for Gene Set Analysis Integrating Multilevel Omics Data

Extending Modified Module Analysis to Include Correct Responses: An Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory

Reconstruction of cellular signal transduction networks using perturbation assays and linear programming

Modules for Automated Validation and Comparison of Models of Neurophysiological and Neurocognitive Biomarkers of Psychiatric Disorders: ASSRUnit - A Case Study

VBA: a probabilistic treatment of nonlinear models for neurobiological and behavioural data

Impact of noise on molecular network inference

Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks from Genetic Perturbations with Linear Regression Model

Validating module network learning algorithms using simulated data

Benchmarking Transcriptomics Foundation Models for Perturbation Analysis : one PCA still rules them all

Reverse Engineering Gene Networks with ANN: Variability in Network Inference Algorithms

Comparison of Modularization Methods in Application to Different Biological Networks

Quantification of biological network perturbations for mechanistic insight and diagnostics using two-layer causal models

Bayesian Lookahead Perturbation Policy for Inference of Regulatory Networks

Inferring Regulatory Networks by Combining Perturbation Screens and Steady State Gene Expression Profiles

Detecting variable responses in time-series using repeated measures ANOVA: Application to physiologic challenges

Leveraging massively parallel reporter assays for evolutionary questions

Converting networks to predictive logic models from perturbation signalling data with CellNOpt