Rethinking the residual approach: Leveraging machine learning to operationalize cognitive resilience in Alzheimer's disease

Colin Birkenbihl,Madison Cuppels,Rory T Boyle,Hannah M Klinger,Oliver Langford,Gillian T Coughlan,Michael J Properzi,Jasmeer P Chhatwal,Julie C Price,Aaron P Schultz,Dorene M Rentz,Rebecca E Amariglio,Keith A Johnson,Shubhabrata Mukherjee,Rebecca F Gottesman,Paul Maruff,Yen Ying Lim,Colin L Masters,Alexa Beiser,Susan M Resnick,Timothy M Hughes,Samantha Burnham,Ilke Tunali,Susan Landau,Ann D Cohen,Sterling C. Johnson,Tobey J Betthauser,Sudha Seshadri,Samuel N Lockhart,Sid E O'Bryant,Prashanthi Vemuri,Reisa A Sperling,Timothy J Hohman,Michael C Donohue,Rachel F Buckley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.19.24312256

2024-09-18

Abstract:Cognitive resilience describes the phenomenon of individuals evading cognitive decline despite prominent Alzheimer's disease neuropathology. Operationalization and measurement of this latent construct is non-trivial as it cannot be directly observed. The residual approach has been widely applied to estimate CR, where the degree of resilience is estimated through a linear model's residuals. We demonstrate that this approach makes specific, uncontrollable assumptions and likely leads to biased and erroneous resilience estimates. We propose an alternative strategy which overcomes the standard approach's limitations using machine learning principles. Our proposed approach makes fewer assumptions about the data and construct to be measured and achieves better estimation accuracy on simulated ground-truth data.

Health Informatics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper primarily explores the measurement methods of cognitive resilience (CR) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Specifically:

1. **Definition of Cognitive Resilience**: Cognitive resilience describes a phenomenon where individuals are able to avoid cognitive decline despite significant Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes.

2. **Limitations of the Traditional Residual Method**: The widely used residual method has specific and uncontrollable assumptions when estimating cognitive resilience, which may lead to biased and erroneous estimation results. The residual method estimates the degree of cognitive resilience through the residuals of a linear model.

3. **Proposed New Method**: The paper proposes a new method based on machine learning principles to overcome the limitations of the traditional residual method. The new method makes fewer assumptions about the data and the constructs to be measured and has achieved better estimation accuracy on simulated real data.

4. **Experimental Validation**: Through simulated data and known true values, the paper compares the performance of the traditional residual method and the newly proposed inverse learning method under different experimental settings. The results show that in various scenarios, the estimation error of the inverse learning method is lower than that of the traditional method.

In summary, the paper aims to propose a new method for measuring cognitive resilience to improve its accuracy and reliability.