Efficacy and Safety of Albendazole 400 mg for 30 Days in Adult Patients with Low Microfilaremia: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial Compared to Ivermectin

Luccheri Ndong Akomezoghe,Noé Patrick M'Bondoukwé,Denise Patricia Mawili Mboumba,Jacques Mari Ndong Ngomo,Bridy Chesli Moutombi Ditombi,Coella Joyce Mihindou,Hadry Roger Sibi Matotou,Valentin Migueba Migueba,Marielle Karine Bouyou Akotet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.16.24310835
2024-08-17
Abstract:Background infection is endemic in central African countries like Gabon and in West Africa. Treatment typically involves the use of ivermectin and albendazole, with albendazole often used to reduce microfilaremia in individuals with high microfilaremia before administering ivermectin. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of albendazole in patients with low microfilaremia. Methodology and principal findings The study was conducted from November 7 to April 1 across 31 villages in the Woleu-Ntem province of northern Gabon. Following a questionnaire, venous blood was collected in EDTA tubes for diagnosis. Eligible individuals were randomized into two treatment groups and followed for 30 days. One group received daily albendazole tablets (400 mg), while the other received a single dose of ivermectin (200μg/kg). The study reported a 33.0% prevalence of infection in northern Gabon. In the per-protocol analysis, the mean microfilaremia decreased significantly by 82.3% and 90.4% in the ALB and IVM groups, respectively (p>0.001). The risk difference between the treatments was 8.1% [95% CI: 16.8 ; -0.6%]. For the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean microfilaremia decreased significantly by 82.4% and 90.8% in the ALB and IVM groups, respectively (p>0.001), with a risk difference of 8.4% [95% CI: 16.2 ; 0.6%]. Eosinophil rates decreased by day 30 in both groups, though not significantly different (p>0.05). Conclusions/Significance The prevalence of infection (33.05%) is notably high in northern Gabon. Albendazole demonstrated microfilaricidal activity in individuals with low microfilaremia. However, its efficacy appears inferior to that of ivermectin and seems to diminish at very low microfilarial loads.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?