Abstract:Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables non-invasive monitoring of healthy brain development and disease. Widely used higher field (>1.5 T) MRI systems are associated with high energy and infrastructure requirements, and high costs. Recent ultra-low-field (<0.1T) systems provide a more accessible and cost-effective alternative. However, it is not known whether anatomical ultra-low-field neuroimaging can be used to extract quantitative measures of brain morphometry, and to what extent such measures correspond to high-field MRI. Here we scanned 23 healthy adults aged 20-69 years on two identical 64 mT systems and a 3 T system, using T w and T w scans across a range of (64 mT) resolutions. We segmented brain images into 4 global tissue types and 98 local structures, and systematically evaluated between-scanner reliability of 64 mT morphometry and correspondence to 3 T measurements, using correlations of tissue volume and Dice spatial overlap of segmentations. We report high 64 mT reliability and correspondence to 3 T across 64 mT scan contrasts and resolutions, with highest performance shown by combining three T w scans with low through-plane resolution into a single higher-resolution scan using multi-resolution registration. Larger structures show higher 64 mT reliability and correspondence to 3 T. Finally, we showcase the potential of ultra-low-field MRI for mapping neuroanatomical changes across the lifespan, and monitoring brain structures relevant to neurological disorders. Raw images and code are publicly available ( ), enabling systematic validation of pre-processing and analysis approaches for ultra-low-field neuroimaging.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper mainly explores the reliability of ultra - low - field (ULF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in brain morphometry and its consistency with high - field MRI results. Specifically, the research aims to answer the following key questions: 1. **Reliability of ultra - low - field MRI**: Can ultra - low - field MRI (<0.1T) provide reliable brain morphometric data? That is, are the measurement results consistent when the same object is repeatedly scanned between different scanners? 2. **Consistency with high - field MRI**: How does the brain morphometric data obtained by ultra - low - field MRI compare with that of traditional high - field MRI (>1.5T) in terms of consistency? This includes the degree of spatial overlap in volume measurement and segmentation results. 3. **Effect of multi - resolution fusion**: By combining multiple low - resolution ultra - low - field scans into a high - resolution image through multi - resolution registration, can the reliability of ultra - low - field MRI and its consistency with high - field MRI be improved? 4. **Influence of structure size on measurement**: Are larger brain structures more reliably measured in ultra - low - field MRI and have better consistency with high - field MRI than smaller structures? 5. **Potential for clinical applications**: Can ultra - low - field MRI be used to monitor key structures (such as the hippocampus) in neurodegenerative diseases (such as Alzheimer's disease) and identify brain structure changes that deviate significantly from normal values among individuals? ### Research background Although traditional high - field MRI systems provide high - quality brain imaging, their high cost and complex infrastructure requirements limit their wide application. In contrast, ultra - low - field MRI systems have the advantages of portability, low cost, and easy operation, and can be used at the bedside or in resource - limited environments. However, the image quality and accuracy of quantitative measurements of ultra - low - field MRI have not been fully verified, especially in brain morphometry. ### Research methods To answer the above questions, the researchers carried out the following work: - **Experimental design**: 23 healthy adults were recruited and scanned multiple times on two identical 64 mT ultra - low - field MRI systems and one 3 T high - field MRI system. - **Image acquisition**: T1 - weighted (T1w) and T2 - weighted (T2w) images were acquired, and four different resolution settings were used, and a higher - resolution image (MRR) was generated from three high - resolution planar images through multi - resolution registration. - **Image processing**: The SynthSeg + tool was used to segment and partition all scanned images and extract the volumes of 98 structures. - **Data analysis**: The test - retest reliability of ultra - low - field MRI was evaluated, and its consistency with high - field MRI was evaluated through volume correlation and Dice coefficient. ### Main findings - **High reliability**: The reliability of ultra - low - field T2w MRR scans between different scanners is very high, especially for volume measurement of larger structures. - **Good consistency**: Ultra - low - field MRI and high - field MRI show a high degree of consistency in brain structure volume measurement, although there are some minor differences. - **Advantages of multi - resolution fusion**: The high - resolution image generated through multi - resolution registration significantly improves the reliability and consistency of ultra - low - field MRI. - **Influence of structure size**: Larger brain structures show higher reliability and better consistency in ultra - low - field MRI. These findings indicate that ultra - low - field MRI has potential application value in brain morphometry, especially in resource - limited environments.

Ultra-low-field brain MRI morphometry: test-retest reliability and correspondence to high-field MRI

Quantitative Brain Morphometry of Portable Low-Field-Strength MRI Using Super-Resolution Machine Learning

Bridging the gap: improving correspondence between low-field and high-field magnetic resonance images in young people. Original Research article

Single-Subject Morphological Brain Networks: Connectivity Mapping, Topological Characterization and Test-Retest Reliability

Accurate super-resolution low-field brain MRI

Brain morphometrics correlations with age among 352 participants imaged with both 3T and 7T MRI: 7T improves statistical power and reduces required sample size

Quantifying white matter hyperintensity and brain volumes in heterogeneous clinical and low-field portable MRI

Ultra-high field MRI: Advancing systems neuroscience towards mesoscopic human brain function

Simultaneous relaxometry and morphometry of human brain structures with 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting: a multicenter, multiplatform, multifield-strength study

434. Improving Image Accuracy in Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Make Accessible Biomarkers for Psychiatric Disorders

Ultra-low-field paediatric MRI in low- and middle-income countries: super-resolution using a multi-orientation U-Net

The impact of ultra-high field MRI on cognitive and computational neuroimaging

Challenges and Opportunities of Ultra-High Field MRI

Quantitative Brain Mapping Using Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting on a 50-Mt Portable MRI Scanner

Development of neonatal-specific sequences for portable ultralow field magnetic resonance brain imaging: a prospective, single-centre, cohort study

Brain imaging with portable low-field MRI

Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sensitively Detects and Accurately Quantifies Multiple Sclerosis Lesions

Automated deep learning segmentation of high-resolution 7 T postmortem MRI for quantitative analysis of structure-pathology correlations in neurodegenerative diseases

Ultra-high-resolution mapping of cortical layers 3T-guided 7T MRI

Automated deep learning segmentation of high-resolution 7 Tesla postmortem MRI for quantitative analysis of structure-pathology correlations in neurodegenerative diseases

Deep learning enabled fast 3D brain MRI at 0.055 tesla