Abstract:Intracellular bodies such as nucleoli, Cajal bodies and various signalling assemblies represent membraneless organelles, or condensates, that form via liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS)1,2. Biomolecular interactions—particularly homotypic interactions mediated by self-associating intrinsically disordered protein regions—are thought to underlie the thermodynamic driving forces for LLPS, forming condensates that can facilitate the assembly and processing of biochemically active complexes, such as ribosomal subunits within the nucleolus. Simplified model systems3–6 have led to the concept that a single fixed saturation concentration is a defining feature of endogenous LLPS7–9, and has been suggested as a mechanism for intracellular concentration buffering2,7,8,10. However, the assumption of a fixed saturation concentration remains largely untested within living cells, in which the richly multicomponent nature of condensates could complicate this simple picture. Here we show that heterotypic multicomponent interactions dominate endogenous LLPS, and give rise to nucleoli and other condensates that do not exhibit a fixed saturation concentration. As the concentration of individual components is varied, their partition coefficients change in a manner that can be used to determine the thermodynamic free energies that underlie LLPS. We find that heterotypic interactions among protein and RNA components stabilize various archetypal intracellular condensates—including the nucleolus, Cajal bodies, stress granules and P-bodies—implying that the composition of condensates is finely tuned by the thermodynamics of the underlying biomolecular interaction network. In the context of RNA-processing condensates such as the nucleolus, this manifests in the selective exclusion of fully assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes, providing a thermodynamic basis for vectorial ribosomal RNA flux out of the nucleolus. This methodology is conceptually straightforward and readily implemented, and can be broadly used to extract thermodynamic parameters from microscopy images. These approaches pave the way for a deeper understanding of the thermodynamics of multicomponent intracellular phase behaviour and its interplay with the nonequilibrium activity that is characteristic of endogenous condensates. Heterotypic multicomponent interactions are shown to dominate the liquid–liquid phase separation that enables the formation of intracellular condensates.

Biomolecular condensates bridge experiment and theory of mass-conserving reaction-diffusion systems in phase separation

Biomolecular condensates and biogeomorphological systems exhibit a phase-separation behavior unified by a mass-conserving model

Deciphering the molecular mechanism underlying morphology transition in two-component DNA-protein cophase separation

Deciphering the Molecular Mechanism of DNA-protein Interactive Co-Condensates

Extreme dynamics in a biomolecular condensate

Predicting the morphology of multiphase biomolecular condensates from protein interaction networks

Phase transitions in chromatin: mesoscopic and mean-field approaches

Chromatin mechanics dictates subdiffusion and coarsening dynamics of embedded condensates

Mesoscale properties of biomolecular condensates emerging from protein chain dynamics

Theory and simulation of multiphase coexistence in biomolecular mixtures

Spatial Organization of Phase-separated DNA Droplets

Asymptotic analysis of conversion-limited phase separation

Simulating the chromatin mediated phase separation of model proteins with multiple domains

Composition-dependent thermodynamics of intracellular phase separation

Biomolecular condensates form spatially inhomogeneous network fluids

A molecular view into the structure and dynamics of phase-separated chromatin

Emerging biophysical principles of macromolecular phase separation

Controlling biomolecular condensates via chemical reactions

Competition between Self-Assembly and Phase Separation Governs High-Temperature Condensation of a DNA Liquid