Amyloid age and tau PET timeline to symptomatic Alzheimer's disease in Down syndrome

Emily K Schworer,Matthew Zammit,Jiebiao Wang,Benjamin Handen,Tobey Betthauser,Charles Laymon,Dana Tudorascu,Annie Cohen,Shahid Zaman,Beau Ances,Mark Mapstone,Elizabeth Head,William klunk,Bradley Christian,Sigan L Hartley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.08.24311702
2024-08-09
Abstract:Background: Adults with Down syndrome (DS) are at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent natural history cohort studies have characterized AD biomarkers, with a focus on PET amyloid beta (Aβ) and PET tau. Leveraging these well characterized biomarkers, the present study examined the timeline to symptomatic AD based on estimated years since reaching Aβ+, referred to as amyloid age, and in relation to tau in a large cohort of individuals with DS. Methods: In this multicenter cohort study, 25 to 57 year-old adults with DS (n = 167) were assessed twice from 2017 to 2022, with approximately 32 months between visits as part of the Alzheimer Biomarker Consortium Down Syndrome. Adults with DS completed amyloid and tau PET scans, and were administered the modified Cued Recall Test and the Down Syndrome Mental Status Examination. Study partners completed the National Task Group Early Detection Screen for Dementia. Findings: Mixed linear regressions showed significant quadratic associations between amyloid age and cognitive performance and cubic associations between amyloid age and tau, both at baseline and across 32 months. Using broken stick regression models, differences in mCRT scores were detected beginning 2.7 years following Aβ+ in cross-sectional models, with an estimated decline of 1.3 points per year. Increases in tau began, on average, 2.7 to 6.1 years following Aβ+. On average, participants with mild cognitive impairment were 7.4 years post Aβ+ and those with dementia were 12.7 years post Aβ+. Interpretation: There is a short timeline to initial cognitive decline and dementia from Aβ+ (Centiloid = 18) and tau deposition in DS relative to late onset AD. The established timeline based on amyloid age (or equivalent Centiloid values) is important for clinical practice and informing AD clinical trials, and avoids limitations of timelines based on chronological age. Funding: National Institute on Aging and the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.
Neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?