Resource Considerations for Acute Ischemic Stroke Intervention in Nonagenarians

Sani Gandhi,Kimberly Hollender,Florence Chukwuneke,Deviyani Mehta,Roger C Cheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.24.24310904

2024-07-24

Abstract:Background: While there is evidence to support the viability of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) as treatments for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) even in the very elderly, there are practical considerations to be made regarding triage and resource allocation, particularly in a hub-and-spoke system of stroke intervention. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using stroke quality registry data from 2017-2021 at a comprehensive stroke center serving as the primary hub for an associated healthcare system. We identified patients aged 90 or above who received acute stroke treatment with IVT and/or MT. NIHSS, modified Rankin Score (mRS), transfer status, length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition were examined. Results: Out of 268 total nonagenarians admitted for AIS, 60 received an acute intervention (37 IVT, 14 MT, 9 both). All MT attempts resulted in successful reperfusion (>TICI2b). Median initial and discharge mRS were 2 and 5 respectively; only 3.3% were discharged home, with 46.7% of patients either deceased or discharged to hospice. Median LOS was 5 days (range 0-77), but prolonged LOS was common, with 11 patients having LOS >14 days. Comparing the groups who received MT vs. IVT alone, the median initial NIHSS was 17 vs. 15 (p=0.23); the MT group had better baseline mRS (1 vs 3, p=0.005), but despite this, there were no significant differences in mortality (57% vs 41%) or discharge mRS (5 vs. 5). Median LOS was not significantly different (6 vs. 5 days). Mortality in MT was 75% for transfers vs. 53% for local arrivals (p=0.36). Conclusion: Despite safe and technically successful treatment, outcomes were poor overall in the nonagenarian population after both MT +/- IVT, with very high morbidity and mortality.

Neurology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to resource considerations for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) interventions in nonagenarians and above. Although there is evidence to support intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) as effective means of treating AIS, even for very elderly patients, under the stroke intervention model mainly based on the "hub - satellite" system, there are still practical considerations regarding the triage and resource allocation for such patients. Specifically, the study explored the following points:

1. **Treatment Efficacy and Prognosis**: The study evaluated the clinical outcomes, especially the functional recovery and mortality, of nonagenarian and above elderly patients after receiving IVT and/or MT treatment.
2. **Resource Allocation**: It explored how to rationally allocate medical resources in the "hub - satellite" system, especially when considering whether patients need long - distance transfer for treatment.
3. **Patient - Centered Decision - making**: The study also discussed the communication between doctors and family members before providing intervention treatment to ensure that decisions are made in the best interests of the patients.

By retrospectively analyzing the data of nonagenarian and above elderly patients treated in a comprehensive stroke center between 2017 and 2021, the study aims to provide more specific guidance and suggestions for stroke intervention in this special population.