Patterns of Ongoing Thought in the Real World and Their Link to Mental Health and Well-Being

Bridget Mulholland,Louis Chitiz,Raven Wallace,Bronte Mckeown,Michael Milham,Arno Klein,Robert Leech,Elizabeth Jefferies,Giulia Poerio,Jeffery Wammes,Jonathan Smallwood
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.22.604681
2024-07-23
Abstract:The thoughts we experience in daily life have important implications for our health and well-being. However, it is often difficult to measure thoughts patterns outside of laboratory conditions due to concerns about the voracity of measurements taken outside of controlled laboratory conditions. To address this gap in the literature, our study set out to measure patterns of thought as they occur in daily life and assess the robustness of these measures and their associations with traits measurements of health and well-being. A sample of undergraduate participants completed multi-dimensional experience sampling (mDES) surveys eight times per day for five days in daily life. Principal component analysis (PCA) reduced these data to identify the dimensions that explained the patterns of thoughts reported in our study. We used (LMM) modelling to map how these thought patterns relate to the activities taking place, highlighting good consistency within the sample, as well as substantial overlap with prior work. Multiple regression was used to examine the association between patterns of ongoing thought and aspects of mental health and well-being, highlighting a pattern of negative intrusive distraction that had a positive association with anxiety, and a negative association with social well-being. Notably, states of intrusive distraction tended to be most prevalent in solo activities and was relatively suppressed when interacting with other people (either in person or virtually). Our study, therefore, highlights the use of mDES as a tool to understand how thoughts in daily life impact on our mental health and well-being and highlight an important role in social connectedness in the etiology of intrusive thinking.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of how people's thinking patterns in real life affect their mental health and well-being. Specifically, the researchers measured participants' thinking patterns in daily life using the multi-dimensional experience sampling (mDES) method and assessed the reliability of these measurements and their associations with health and well-being indicators. The study found that negative intrusive distracting thinking patterns were positively correlated with anxiety and negatively correlated with social well-being. Additionally, this intrusive distracting state was more prevalent during solitary activities and relatively reduced during interactions with others. Therefore, the study highlights the importance of mDES as a tool to help understand how daily thinking affects our mental health and well-being and underscores the significant role of social connections in the etiology of intrusive thoughts.