Gut and oral microbial community characterization from women with breast cancer, women with ductal carcinoma in situ, and healthy women reveals differences in gut but not oral microbiota

Emma McCune,Anukriti Sharma,Breanna Johnson,Tess O'Meara,Sarah Theiner,Maribel Campos,Diane Heditsian,Susie Brain,Jack Gilbert,Laura Esserman,Michael Campbell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.22.604621
2024-07-22
Abstract:This study characterized and compared the fecal and oral microbiota from women with early-stage breast cancer (BC), women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and healthy women. Fecal and oral samples were collected from newly diagnosed patients prior to any therapy and characterized using 16S rRNA sequencing. Measures of gut microbial alpha diversity were significantly lower in the BC versus healthy cohort. Beta diversity differed significantly between the BC or DCIS and healthy groups and several differentially abundant taxa were identified. Clustering (non-negative matrix factorization) of the gut microbiota identified 5 bacterial guilds dominated by either Prevotella, Enterobacteriaceae, Akkermansia, Clostridiales, or Bacteroides. The Bacteroides and Enterobacteriaceae guilds were significantly more abundant in the BC cohort compared to healthy controls whereas the Clostridiales guild was more abundant in the healthy group. Finally, prediction of functional pathways identified 23 pathways that differed between the BC and healthy gut microbiota including lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, lipid metabolism, and sphingolipid metabolism. In contrast to the gut microbiomes, there were no significant differences in alpha or beta diversity in the oral microbiomes and very few differentially abundant taxa were observed. NMF analysis of the oral microbiota samples identified 7 guilds dominated by Veillonella, Prevotella, Gemellaceae, Haemophilus, Neisseria, Propionibacterium, and Streptococcus, however, none of these guilds were differentially associated with the different cohorts. Our results suggest that alterations in the gut microbiota, but not oral microbiota, may provide the basis for interventions targeting the gut microbiome to improve treatment outcomes and long-term prognosis.
Microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?