WHO WINS? COMPARISON BETWEEN EMERGENT MACROPHYTES AND PONTEDERIA CRASSIPES (WATER HYACINTH) AS NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS FOR NUTRIENT PHYTOREMEDIATION AND CYANOBACTERIA MITIGATION

Cesar Macedo Filho,Allan Amorim Santos,Daniel Lima,Luan de Oliveira Silva,Ana Beatriz Furlanetto Pacheco,Sandra Maria Feliciano de Oliveira e Azevedo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.16.603719
2024-07-19
Abstract:Emergent macrophytes are commonly used to control eutrophication in Constructed Floating Wetlands (CFW) systems. However, tropical emergent macrophyte species, particularly from South America, are underrepresented in these applications. This study aims to investigate the potential of five emergent macrophytes, Alternanthera philoxeroides, Ludwigia leptocarpa, Polygonum ferrugineum, Typha domingensis, and Urochloa mutica in controlling eutrophication and inhibiting cyanobacterial growth, compared to the floating macrophyte Pontederia crassipes, the most studied macrophyte for this purpose. Phytoremediation experiments were performed ex-situ in mesocosms (50 L) with high soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concentration (400 ug L-1). Allelopathic effects of the macrophytes root exudates on cyanobacteria were tested in vitro using a strain of Microcystis aeruginosa. While P. crassipes reduced SRP concentration by 86% in 14 days, the tested macrophytes reduced SRP concentration by > 94%, except for T. domingensis, which showed a reduction of 64%. NH4+ and NO3- removal in 14 days were 96% and 62%, respectively, for P. crassipes. These values corresponded to 96% and 63% for the five tested macrophytes. Root exudates of A. philoxeroides, L. leptocarpa, and P. ferrugineum caused inhibition of M. aeruginosa growth with no detection of Chl-a after 7 days. Thus, three emergent macrophytes were more efficient in removing nutrients than P. crassipes. and showed allelopathic potential against cyanobacteria, indicating that using local emergent macrophytes in CFW systems can be a valuable and sustainable tool to mitigate eutrophication and its consequences in aquatic environments.
Ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?