A third kind of episodic memory: Context familiarity is distinct from item familiarity and recollection

Richard J Addante,Evan Clise,Randal Waechter,Jesse Bengson,Daniel L Drane,Jahdiel Perez-Caban
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.15.603640
2024-10-16
Abstract:Episodic memory is accounted for with two processes: familiarity when generally recognizing an item and recollection when retrieving the full contextual details bound with the item. Paradoxically, people sometimes report contextual information as familiar but without recollecting details, which is not easily accounted for by existing theories. We tested a combination of item recognition confidence and source memory, focusing upon item-only hits with source unknown (item familiarity), low-confidence hits with correct source memory (context familiarity), and high-confidence hits with correct source memory (recollection). Results across multiple within-subjects (trial-wise) and between subjects (individual variability) levels indicated these were behaviorally and physiologically distinct. Behaviorally, a crossover interaction was evident in response times, with context familiarity being slower than each condition during item recognition, but faster during source memory. Electrophysiologically, a Condition x Time x Location triple dissociation was evident in event-related potentials (ERPs), which was then independently replicated among different multiple datasets. Context familiarity exhibited an independent negative central effect from 800-1200 ms, differentiated from positive ERPs for item-familiarity (400 to 600 ms) and recollection (600 to 900 ms). These three conditions thus reflect mutually exclusive, fundamentally different processes of episodic memory. Context familiarity is a third distinct process of episodic memory.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?