Abstract:Background: The current lower limb robotic exoskeleton training (LRET) for treating and managing stroke patients remains a huge challenge. Comprehensive ICF analysis and informative treatment options are needed. This review aims to analyze LRET' s efficacy for stroke patients, based on ICF, and explore the impact of intervention intensities, devices, and stroke phases. Methods: We searched Web of Science, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library for RCTs on LRET for stroke patients. Two authors reviewed studies, extracted data, and assessed quality and bias. Standardized protocols were used. PEDro and ROB2 were employed for quality assessment. All analyses were done with RevMan 5.4. Results: Thirty-four randomized controlled trials (1,166 participants) were included. For function, LRET significantly improved motor control (MD = 1.15, 95%CI = 0.29-2.01, p = 0.009, FMA-LE), and gait parameters (MD = 0.09, 95%CI = 0.03-0.16, p = 0.004, Instrumented Gait Velocity; MD = 0.06, 95%CI = 0.02-0.09, p = 0.002, Step length; MD = 4.48, 95%CI = 0.32-8.65, p = 0.04, Cadence) compared with conventional rehabilitation. For activity, LRET significantly improved walking independence (MD = 0.25, 95%CI = 0.02-0.48, p = 0.03, FAC), Gait Velocity (MD = 0.07, 95%CI = 0.03-0.11, p = 0.001) and balance (MD = 2.34, 95%CI = 0.21-4.47, p = 0.03, BBS). For participation, social participation (MD = 0.12, 95%CI = 0.03-0.21, p = 0.01, EQ-5D) was superior to conventional rehabilitation. Based on subgroup analyses, LRET improved motor control (MD = 1.37, 95%CI = 0.47-2.27, p = 0.003, FMA-LE), gait parameters (MD = 0.08, 95%CI = 0.02-0.14, p = 0.006, Step length), Gait Velocity (MD = 0.11, 95%CI = 0.03-0.19, p = 0.005) and activities of daily living (MD = 2.77, 95%CI = 1.37-4.16, p = 0.0001, BI) for the subacute patients, while no significant improvement for the chronic patients. For exoskeleton devices, treadmill-based exoskeletons showed significant superiority for balance (MD = 4.81, 95%CI = 3.10-6.52, p < 0.00001, BBS) and activities of daily living (MD = 2.67, 95%CI = 1.25-4.09, p = 0.00002, BI), while Over-ground exoskeletons was more effective for gait parameters (MD = 0.05, 95%CI = 0.02-0.08, p = 0.0009, Step length; MD = 6.60, 95%CI = 2.06-11.15, p = 0.004, Cadence) and walking independence (MD = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.14-0.44, p = 0.0002, FAC). Depending on the training regimen, better results may be achieved with daily training intensities of 45-60 min and weekly training intensities of 3 h or more. Conclusion: These findings offer insights for healthcare professionals to make effective LRET choices based on stroke patient needs though uncertainties remain. Particularly, the assessment of ICF participation levels and the design of time-intensive training deserve further study. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, Unique Identifier: CRD42024501750.

Effects of robotic gait rehabilitation with Lokomat® in vascular hemiplegia

The effect of the Lokomat® robotic-orthosis system on lower extremity rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Effects of Combined Virtual Reality Exercises and Robot Assisted Gait Training on Cognitive Functions, Daily Living Activities, and Quality of Life in High Functioning Individuals With Subacute Stroke

Effects of robotic-assisted gait training on physical capacity, and quality of life among chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled study

Gait Training-Based Motor Imagery and EEG Neurofeedback in Lokomat: A Clinical Intervention With Complete Spinal Cord Injury Individuals

Conflicting results of robot-assisted versus usual gait training during postacute rehabilitation of stroke patients: a randomized clinical trial

A Progress Evaluation

Efficacy of a Novel Exoskeletal Robot for Locomotor Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients: A Multi-center, Non-inferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

Robotic gait training and botulinum toxin injection improve gait in the chronic post-stroke phase: A randomized controlled trial

Therapeutic Effects of Robotic-Exoskeleton-Assisted Gait Rehabilitation and Predictive Factors of Significant Improvements in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of virtual reality training on gait biomechanics of individuals post-stroke

Robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) improves walking function and activity in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Robotic Restoration of Gait Function in Patients in the Early Recovery Period of Stroke

Effects of wearable ankle robotics for stair and over-ground training on sub-acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Effect of robotic exoskeleton training on lower limb function, activity and participation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Effects of the Robot-Assisted Gait Training Device Plus Physiotherapy in Improving Ambulatory Functions in Patients With Subacute Stroke With Hemiplegia: An Assessor-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Stroke Rehabilitation Using Gait Robot-Assisted Training and Person-Centered Goal Setting: A Single Blinded Pilot Study

Safety and Feasibility of Robot-assisted Gait Training in Adults with Cerebral Palsy in an Inpatient Setting - an Observational Study

Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke

Effects of robotic neurorehabilitation through lokomat plus virtual reality on cognitive function in patients with traumatic brain injury: A retrospective case-control study

The Effectiveness of Overground Robot Exoskeleton Gait Training on Gait Outcomes, Balance, and Motor Function in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials