Seasonal influenza A virus lineages exhibit divergent abilities to antagonize interferon induction and signaling

Joel Rivera-Cardona,Neeha Kakuturu,Elizabeth F Rowland,Qi Wen Teo,Elizabeth A Thayer,Timothy J.C. Tan,Jiayi Sun,Collin Kieffer,Nicholas C. Wu,Christopher B Brooke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.11.603146

2024-07-12

Abstract:The circulation of seasonal influenza A viruses (IAVs) in humans relies on effective evasion and subversion of the host immune response. While the evolution of seasonal H1N1 and H3N2 viruses to avoid humoral immunity is well characterized, relatively little is known about the evolution of innate immune antagonism phenotypes in these viruses. Numerous studies have established that only a small subset of infected cells is responsible for initiating the type I and type III interferon (IFN) response during IAV infection, emphasizing the importance of single cell studies to accurately characterize the IFN response during infection. We developed a flow cytometry-based method to examine transcriptional changes in IFN and interferon stimulated gene (ISG) expression at the single cell level. We observed that NS segments derived from seasonal H3N2 viruses are more efficient at antagonizing IFN signaling but less effective at suppressing IFN induction, compared to the pdm2009 H1N1 lineage. We compared a collection of NS segments spanning the natural history of the current seasonal IAV lineages and demonstrate long periods of stability in IFN antagonism potential, punctuated by occasional phenotypic shifts. Altogether, our data reveal significant differences in how seasonal and pandemic H1N1 and H3N2 viruses antagonize the human IFN response at the single cell level.

Microbiology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily discusses the differences in the ability of seasonal Influenza A viruses (IAVs) to counteract interferon (IFN) induction and signaling. Specifically, the study points out that while there has been considerable research on how H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes evade humoral immunity, there is little understanding of the evolutionary characteristics of these viruses in combating innate immune responses. Researchers have developed a flow cytometry-based method to detect changes in IFN and interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression at the single-cell level, to more accurately describe the IFN response during viral infection.

The study found that non-structural protein (NS) segments from seasonal H3N2 viruses are more effective at inhibiting IFN signaling than the 2009 pandemic H1N1 subtype, but less effective at inhibiting IFN induction. By comparing NS segments from a range of IAV subtypes that have appeared in natural history, the research revealed the stability of IFN antagonistic potential over a long period, occasionally accompanied by phenotypic shifts. Overall, the data suggest significant differences in the way seasonal and pandemic H1N1 and H3N2 viruses counteract the human IFN response at the single-cell level.

By adopting a novel flow cytometry-fluorescence in situ hybridization technique, the research team was able to precisely quantify the innate immune induction in individual cells after infection. The results show that H1N1 and H3N2 viruses differ in their ability to counteract IFN induction and IFN signaling, with these differences mainly related to the NS segments. Furthermore, the study also showed that since the 2009 pandemic, the current H1N1 subtype NS segments have maintained a stable capacity to counteract IFN induction and signaling, while H3N2 NS segments have undergone significant phenotypic shifts since their emergence in 1968. These findings reveal a new dimension of how IAVs counteract the IFN response at the single-cell level and demonstrate how this ability has evolved over decades of human transmission.