A Randomised Study Comparing First-line Dual Vs Single-Stentretriever Technique: TWIN2WIN

Alejandro Tomasello,Manuel Moreu,Mikel Terceno,Lavinia Dinia,Maria Rosario Barrena-Caballo,Manuel Requena,Judith Cendrero,Magda Jablonska,Alan Flores,Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez,Francesco Diana,David Hernandez,Marta De Dios Lascuevas,Marta Rubiera,Álvaro García-Tornel,Federica Rizzo,Marta Olivé Gadea,Carlos Pérez-García,Carmen Trejo Gallego,Tomás Carmona,Marc Rodrigo-Gisbert,Carlos A. Molina,Marc Ribo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.11.24310312
2024-07-16
Abstract:Double stentretriever (double-SR) is used as rescue technique when recanalization is not achieved during thrombectomy. Double-SR, if applied as firstline could increase first-pass recanalization, known to be associated with better outcomes. We aime to assess the safety and efficacy of firstline double-SR. Methods: Randomized, blinded adjudicated primary outcome study. Multicenter (5 sites), national (Spain).Patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion within 24 hours after onset, undergoing thrombectomy. Upon confirmation of large vessel occlusion on initial angiogram, patients were randomly allocated to receive firstline single-SR Vs double-SR technique. Investigators could use any technique if further passes were needed. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of double-SR defined as first-pass complete recanalization (eTICI 2c-3) compared to single-SR. First-pass and final successful recanalization (eTICI2b50-3) were centrally assessed by a blinded investigator. The safety outcome was the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). The data safety monitoring board stopped the recruitment after a pre-planned interim analysis because a predefined efficacy boundary was reached. Results From April 2022 to October 2023, 108 patients were included, 50 patients (46%) in the single-SR group and 58 (54%) in the double-SR group. First-pass recanalization was achieved in 12/50 patients (24%) allocated to single-SR and 27/58 (46%) allocated to double-SR (aOR 2.72; 95% CI, 1.19-6.46). Substantial reperfusion within 3 attempts was obtained in 42 patients (84%) allocated to single-SR and in 52 (89%) allocated to double-SR (aOR 1.74; 95% CI, 0.55-5.76). The mean number of passes was 2±1.3 with single-SR and 1.7±1 with double-SR (mean difference, -0.37; 95% CI, -0.79-0.06). A sICH occurred in 3 patients (6%) allocated to single-SR and in 6 (10%) allocated to double-SR (aOR 1.66; 95% CI, 0.40-8.35). Conclusions In stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy, first-line double-SR is safe and superior to single-SR in achieving first-pass but not final recanalization. Implications on clinical outcomes should be studied in specifically designed trials.
Neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?